Introduction: The religion of Zoroaster
Man in his spiritual quest has always longed
for a higher being. Prophet Zoroaster (Zarathushtra) was one of the first
religious genius with an original mind who merged powerful logic with
spiritual thinking. The great prophet of Zoroastrianism is considered to
be the first theologian to have sought new answers to the problems that
were developing on earth.
The Iranian society in which Zoroaster was
born was semi-nomadic. The Asian steppes on which they lived has been
compared to a sea of grass and the inhabitants considered themselves not
as dominant over creation but as no more than a part (albeit a responsible
one) of the chain of being. They developed a kinship with the cattle on
which their lives depended and in tending them they evolved an orderly and
mostly peaceful society.
Their chief form of worship was offered to a
group of divinities called the Ahuras or Lords who were the ethical
guardians of Ashâ. This concept embraced all the three spheres of life,
the physical, moral and spiritual. Their late stone age culture was
materially simple but had a religious tradition full of depth. This they
shared with their Indo Aryan cousins, an offshoot of which developed
slowly into Hinduism. But the great difference was that Zoroastrianism was
essentially revealed by one man, Zoroaster.
Zoroaster was born into a time when life was
getting hard. The old order was breaking down through the development of a
disruptive militarism. An important element in the changes was the coming
of the bronze age to the steppes, which led to the invention of the
war-chariot and new weapons. Bands of chariot riders terrorized the
people, killing herdsmen and stealing the cattle. The rule of Ashâ became
imperiled by these godless greedy men who worshipped mainly the daevas
rather than the ethical Ahuras. The victims were suffering and in
distress, creating the classical situation for a prophet to arise to offer
salvation through consolation and hope to the people. The revealed faith
of Zoroaster was to become the oldest recorded faith of salvation.
Zoroaster developed his beliefs from the old
polytheism of Iran. The greatest religious thought that he offered was to
acknowledge Ahura Mazda, the Lord of Wisdom, the Wise Lord, as God, the
divine creator, the only eternal being. Ahura Mazda is self-existing,
wholly wise and wholly good. The expression Ahura Mazda also stresses the
mental, and not the naturalistic, concept of God, and was therefore a
complete innovation in the meaning of the idea of God. Fundamentally,
Zoroaster's religion was the result of a conscious rebellion against the
pre-existing polytheistic religion.
Under the Zoroastrian concept Ahura Mazda
created the world and all that is in it, including man, who is good, but
the world becomes a battleground where the good meets evil, the source of
all corruption, misery and vice. The world has thus to strive towards
victory, i.e. salvation from evil. This dualism was expressed in the
Gathas as the opposition of the two principles of Ashâ and Drug, between
which man has to choose.
Zoroaster also evoked a number of lesser
divinities, who strive with Ahura Mazda, with different functions, to
fulfill the single aim of salvation. These are the Amesha Spentas, the
"beneficent immortals" who are described as a "spiritualization of the
abstract notions of good thoughts and deeds, truth, desirable power,
wholeness and immortality."
Zoroaster also believed in the justice of God.
To address the injustices in society, he taught that man and woman can
attain heaven by accepting his revelation and acting justly in accordance
with the revelation. These actions are judged on the third day of the
death of a person when his or her good thoughts, words and deeds are
weighed in balance against the bad. If the good actions are in the
majority, the soul passes on to heaven. If the deeds weigh more heavily on
the evil side, the soul plunges into the underworld, a place of punishment
and retribution. Later, when the struggle against evil on earth is finally
over, there will be a resurrection and a last judgment will take place
when molten metal will form a burning river and the reincarnated souls,
along with those then living, will pass in the flesh through the metal.
The good will be saved by divine intervention and the wicked will perish
together with all evil.
These are some of the fundamental doctrines
included in the Gathas. Subsequently, another belief evolved that in the
last battle the good will be led by a world savior, the Saoshyant, who
will be born miraculously of a virgin mother.
The doctrines propounded in the Gathas gave
mankind with a satisfying theology, providing a noble goal for living,
along with specific rules for achieving that goal. This inherent religious
strength enabled Zoroastrianism to survive without any secular or worldly
support, and its adherents lived by the religion and showed themselves
ready to endure persecution and death. After Zoroaster's death, his
followers underwent a dark period.
When Zoroastrianism encountered writing,
sometime around 8th century BC, its priests rejected the use of this
foreign invention for their holy texts. These were a profoundly
conservative class of hereditary priests who believed in the efficacy of
the oral word as a union of sound and sense. All the forms of writing that
they came across, from the cuneiform to the alphabet of the Aramaic, were
not thought to be adequate to represent the sounds of the Indo-Iranian
language. These languages were found to be unfitted for sacred purposes
and the priests continued to rely on their trained and vast memories.
Several centuries were to pass before an unknown genius invented, the
language of Avesta, based on Aramaic, with an alphabet of 44 characters,
carefully designed to render the sounds of the ancient holy tongue. It was
still later that the whole Avesta, i.e. the scripture, was committed into
writing, along with its Zand, i.e. its translation into the then
colloquial, Middle Persian or Pahlavi.
Achaemenian
period
The main topic to be discussed in this paper
is an examination of the ways in which the Zoroastrian religion had
impacted during the
Achaemenian dynasty. A introductory word about them.
Historical accounts tell us that
Zoroastrianism evolved in northeastern Iran and moved west nearly 1000
years after Zoroaster. There it influenced the Median tribes which had
moved eastwards from the Zagros mountains. Of the five Median tribes, one
was Magoi (Magi), who are believed to have been literate and provided the
priesthood for the Medes and western Persians. They moved into the plains
of Kermanshah and established contact with Zoroastrians.
In that same time period, Persians from
southern Iran moved eastwards and overpowered a tribe known as the
Elamites and became the rulers of the kingdom of Anshân near Pars (north
of Shiraz). They ruled as the vassals of the Medians for a century, while
Zoroastrianism progressed among the Medians and the Persians moving
eastwards. The Achaemenian era truly began with the successful rebellion
in 558 BC by
Cyrus the Great against his father- in- law Astyages, the ruler
of the Medians. Under the Achaemenians, the religion of Zoroaster joined
forces with the secular world of the Persian empire. The inscriptions left
by the Achaemenians show a religion that through diffusion, adaptation and
priestly elaborations developed syncretisticlly i.e. through the
combination or reconciliation of differing religious beliefs or practices.
The old traditions were creeping back into the religion and due to contact
with other religious worlds that were alien to the Iranian traditions (the
civilizations of Elam and Mesopotamia), new features were being
incorporated. Although the religion of Zoroaster was a rebellion against
the pre-existent polytheistic religion, some of the old deities from the
mythological and naturalist era were readmitted into the practice of the
religion. These were brought in in the form of the Yazatas and recognized
as Amesha Spentas. While Ahura Mazda still remained the supreme God, the
religion lost its concept of a true monotheism in the real sense. The cult
of Anahita and Tiri were reintroduced, the latter becoming associated with
the Indo-Iranian Tishtrya, a divinity associated with the bringing of
rain.[ii]
We can trace the evidence of these later
incorporations in the inscriptions left by the Achaemenians. The ancestor
of Cyrus, Aryaramnes, referred to Ahura Mazda as God on a tabernacle
discovered in Hamadan in 1920. Aryaramnes inscribed thus: "The country
which I possess was bestowed upon me by Ahura Mazda. By the grace of Ahura
Mazda I am the monarch of this country. I pray that Ahura Mazda may help
me." Similar inscriptions by Cyrus the Great and
Darius the Great, refer to their allegiance with Ahura Mazda.
Darius I has said "I worshipped Ahura Mazda. I am the King by Grace of
Ahura Mazda."
Even
Xerxes, Darius' son, following his father's beliefs, praises
Ahura Mazda and says "where previously Daivas were worshipped .. I
destroyed Daivas and proclaimed that Daivas shall not be worshipped."
During his military exploits Xerxes incorporated part of Egypt into his
kingdom and on the western side marched into Greece. This brought in
several foreign influences and Zoroastrian theologians had to make
compromises to assimilate several non-Zoroastrian divinities. Thus,
Artaxerses II broke the tradition of exceptional praise to Ahura Mazda. At
Persepolis he inscribed that "by the will of Ahura Mazda,
Anahita and Mithra, I built this palace. May Ahura Mazda, Mithra and
Anahita protect me from the evil." The cult of Mithra goes back before
Zoroaster's time in Iran, but it is disputed whether Zoroaster accepted or
denied Mithra. Yet, in contrast to his predecessors Cyrus and Darius,
Ataxerxes II incorporated Mithra in the pantheon of deities, a long time
after the birth of Zoroaster.
The dualism expressed in the Gathas is the
opposition of two PRINCIPLES, Ashâ and Druj. This was simplistically
transformed by the Achaemenians into a straightforward opposition between
Ahura Mazda and Angra Mainyu, or, Ormosd versus Areimanios. The God of
Zoroaster is thus demoted to the same rank as the destroying spirit, and
made his symmetrical opposite. This symmetry is found only in the
historical sources from Achaemenian times onwards.
A dualistic approach is also found in the
religions of Babylonia and Assyria and this approach influenced Zurvanism,
a sort of cult of Zoroastrianism or one based on Indo-Iranian religious
thought. The theme is very characteristic in philosophical and religious
thought in the Mediterranean in the last few centuries before the birth of
Christ. This dualism became a characteristic feature of the Zurvanites. It
has also been expressed in the first chapter of the Bundihishn which
translates the Gathic passage in Yasna, XXX, para. 3-5, concerning the two
opposing principles, as being the twin spirits of Ohrmozd and Ahriman. The
same is done by the Pahlavi commentary to the passage in the Gathas.
It was later under Mani that Zurvanite dualism
was greatly condemned. In fact Manicheans violently attacked those who
claimed that Ormazd and Ahriman were two brothers or that God created both
Good and Evil. Manichaesim also believed in a dualism of its own, but it
at least placed man again at the center of salvation, redeeming Ormazd
from the Zurvanite disgrace and made him the true redeeming God.
This new form of dualism must be considered to
be a very important phenomenon because it did not leave untouched
Zoroaster's teachings with regard to moral value and the dignity and
freedom of man, and caused a great reversal. Thus, whereas, Gathic
tradition gave the central place to Ahura Mazda, and therefore to man as
the bodily symbol of Ahura Mazda on earth, the new approach gave the most
important place to Time and Destiny. Destiny displaces the central concept
of choice that requires man to choose between good and evil and be
individually responsible. Destiny is a concept which provides the human
soul with no escape.
Another change introduced during the
Achaemenian period concerned sacred buildings as places of worship. Gathic
tradition does not recognize sacred buildings as Zoroastrians considered
it wrong to keep God shut up in the walls the dwelling place of whom was
the whole world. Regardless, the Achaemenians erected temples for Anahita
and other temples were constructed in which man made images were replaced
by a sacred fire. [2]
It was also during Ataxerxes's time that the
cult of the Yazatas became deeply rooted as a second pantheon of
Zoroastrian divinities as part of an evolved religion. All these deities
were honored and venerated with a special day of dedication in the
Zoroastrian calendar.
There were several other difference that were
also introduced during the Achaemenian period. Take the case of the symbol
that we recognize as the Fravashi- the divine essence of the creator. This
is also a concept that is alien to the Gathas. Later in the younger Avesta
we come across the concept of Khvarenah - Divine Grace or Divine Fortune.
This comes from a Median term Farnah which means "having the radiance of."
When Darius conquered Egypt, the Egyptian symbol of Sun God, their divine
grace, became accepted in Iranian culture. The Achaemenian monarchs were
considered to possess the divine grace. The male figure in the Fravashi
has been interpreted as being the farvsashi of the monarchs holding the
ring as a symbol of power and prosperity through divinity.
Reference has also been made to the fact that
the name of Zoroaster is nowhere mentioned on Achaemenian inscriptions.
This indicates that Gathic teaching, while supported in principle, was
becoming diluted by pre-Zoroastrian Indo-Iranian thought as well as the
influence of Babylonia and Egypt. But it has also been argued that the
inscriptions are secular writings as evidenced by the fact that even in
Sasanian times when Zoroastrianism became a state religion their
inscriptions do not refer to Zoroaster.
The foundation and consolidation of the
Persian Empire brought the control of religious policy into the hands of
the Achaemenian Kings. In order to justify the authority of the Great King
in the various lands that had been conquered, he was made into a King with
divine authority. Just as Ahura Mazda is the greatest of the Gods, the
Great King became the King of Kings.
The King claimed to have a special
relationship with the supreme God. He was King by virtue of God's will.
Having conquered foreign lands, Iranian interpretations of the gods of
other peoples were introduced, thus allowing for the syncretistic
influence on Zoroastrianism. It is a paradox that while these Zoroastrian
rulers would not impose their religious beliefs on the peoples they had
captured, those very peoples were to change Zoroastrianism drastically.
The sovereignty of the King became protected
by the divine triad of Ahura Mazda, Anahita and Mithra in reflection of
Babylonian and Assyrian beliefs and concepts. At Persepolis, these deities
were celebrated at the great New Year feast. Complicated court ceremonies
made the Great King an inaccessible figure and the public had to pay
divine homage by way of prostration before the King.
The reasons for the changes introduced by the
Achaemenians are more complex than just the religious and political that I
have described. This was a period of great transition and adoption to new
developments. The tribal organization gave way to a Unitarian state that
was soon to become a worldwide monarchy. This was the greatest empire
known to man then, founded by a military aristocracy which ended up
governing from the Nile to the Indus to the Aegean, a vast number of
people of various cultures and beliefs, cultures which like them were also
hundreds and thousands of years old.
Trade and commerce was increasing, new
administrative structures created. Long journeys were undertaken by the
Persians which involved lengthy stays in various satrapies. All these
factors provided the basis for the very profound religious and cultural
changes that were introduced into Zoroastrianism by the Achaemenians.
[i]
The paper was presented in September 1996 during the series of adult
discussion classes held by the Zoroastrian Association of Metropolitan
Washington (ZAMWI) at the Mobed's Residence in Vienna, Virginia. The
topics were developed by Mr. Adi Davar, the Director of adult
religious programs for ZAMWI. The views expressed are those of the
author alone and were developed from publications included in the
reading list for the classes. This paper was published on vohuman.org
on Nov. 10, 2004.
[ii]
During a visit to Iran in late 1990, the author visited the ruins of
a temple dedicated to Anahita located in Kangavar.
|