|
The most striking
observation about the persecution of Zoroastrians and their subsequent
genocide is, that it took place in the birth place of Prophet
Zarathushtra, namely in Iran. The impact of this persecution and its
legacy is felt even today, as it does with the Native Americans who have
suffered a similar faith in their ancestral lands. One of the symptoms of
this form of genocide is that it often robs the victim community of
natural leadership that is familiar with its cultural heritage. One of
the lasting effects of such a vacuum is the eventual disorientation of
that society witnessed often by the lack of unity within it, because it
has forgotten its past and as a consequence does not know how to proceed
forward. However, the end of Zoroastrian persecution in late nineteenth
and early twentieth century Iran only happened because the Zoroastrians of
Iran, India and Great Britain were united in a common objective.
In 1861, the Zoroastrian
Trust Funds of Europe was established by Seth Muncherjee Hormusjee Cama,
Dr. Dadabhai Naoroji and other like minded Parsis, with a written
constitution thus making the ZTFE the oldest South Asian ethnic minority
organisations in Britain.
[1]
In the archives of the
Zoroastrian Trust Funds of Europe, at Zoroastrian House in London, there
is a letter with a golden imperial crest of the Lion and the Sun of
Persia. Under the golden imperial crest, it states;
“From Pahlavi Shah en Shah
of Iran”.
The letter is written in Farsi and addressed;
“To the President of the Parsee Association of Europe, London”.
The signatory is Reza Pahlavi!
Incidentally, it was seldom
for Reza Shah to personally sign letters unless the person the letter was
being addressed was a very important person. Indeed the then President of
the Parsee Association of Europe, the present ZTFE, to whom this letter
was addressed, was a very important person.
[2]
This letter was accompanied
“with a free translation in English”, and was sent with a covering letter,
dated 10th December 1926, by His Excellency Prince Nadir Mirza
Arasteh, Charge d’Affaires at the Legation De Perse in London.
The free translation in
English also has a golden imperial crest of the Lion and the Sun of
Persia. The contents read;
“WE have received the
letter forwarded by the Parsee Society of London, conveying to US the
Society’s felicitations and good wishes for the future welfare and
prosperity of Persia and the Persian people, resulting from OUR efforts.
“WE deeply appreciate the
sentiments and views therein expressed and WE trust and assure you that by
the Grace of Almighty God OUR desires and thoughts, which WE have long
cherished, will be realised to complete the happiness and welfare of this
ancient country.”
(signed) REZA PAHLAVI.
(dated) is Tehran 17th Mehr, 1305.
It is important to note that the terminology used for dating is as per the
ancient Achaemenid Zoroastrian calendar and not the Islamic calendar.
The President of the Parsee
Association of Europe, as mentioned in Arasteh’s letter, was Sir
Mancherjee Merwanjee Bhownaggree.
Who was Bhownaggree? Why
did Reza Shah consider him important?
The British General
Election of 1900, one hundred years ago, witnessed the re - election with
an increased majority of the first non - white MP to win the same
parliamentary seat for the second consecutive term.
[3]
The MP was Sir Mancherjee Merwanjee Bhownaggree, ‘Knight Commander of the
Indian Empire’ and the ‘Order of the Lion and the Sun of Persia’.S6
Bhownaggree was born in 1851 in Bombay, India, and belonged to the
influential ‘Parsi’ community.
[4]
Due to the growing religious persecution of Zoroastrians in Iran following
the Arab conquest in the seventh century, a group of them from Khorasan,
North Eastern Iran decided to leave in the tenth century. These
Zoroastrian religious refugees landed in Sanjan, South Gujarat in India
around 936 CE.
[5]
They were given permission to stay by the local Hindu King, Jadiv Rana,
and their decedents became known as ‘Parsi’ or ‘Persian’.
Bhownaggree came to Britain in 1882 to study law. He was called to the
bar at Lincoln’s Inn in 1885.
[6]
In 1891, he was elected to the Board of Directors of the Zoroastrian Trust
Funds of Europe. In 1908 following Dadabhai Naoroji, he was elected its
third President, a position he maintained by annual election until his
death in 1933. He was interned at the Zoroastrian Cemetery in the village
of Brookwood, Surrey. It was said of Bhownaggree that “he was an
institution in himself!”
[7]
One hundred years ago Great
Britain was the most powerful country in the world, even more powerful
then the United States of America. It was said that the sun never set on
the vast British Empire. Thus, being an elected representative to the
Parliament of Great Britain for the party that not only was in government,
but also the party of the British Establishment namely the Conservative
Party, meant one was in a position of influence. This influence continued
even when one ceased to be an MP! Examining the parliamentary records
from Hansard it is noted that, Bhownaggree as an MP spoke out vigorously
for British investment in Indian industry and education, specifically in
scientific, technical and vocational education. In addition, he reminded
parliament that Great Britain was not honouring her pledge concerning the
equality for all subjects, especially the treatment of Indian labourers in
various parts of the British Empire such as Guyana, Fiji, and Africa. In
South Africa, Gandhi, was Bhownaggree’s main informant.
[8]
One of the oldest photographs in the archives of the ZTFE, is titled,
“Pateti Banquet 1906” held at the Criterion Restaurant, in Piccadilly
London. Seated in far left row, dressed formerly in black bow tie and
black dinner jacket is the young Mohandas K. Gandhi, better known as
Mahatma Gandhi, accompanied by his wife Kastoorba in a sari, while not far
away seated on the top table is Bhownaggree. Dadabhai Naoroji, being the
President is in the Chair, next to him the young Madame Bhikaiji Cama, and
seated next to Cama is the Persian Charge d’ Affair, seated next is Goshi
Captain, grand daughter to Naoroji and friend of Gandhi, followed by Lord
and Lady Reay.
[9]
The purpose for inviting
the Persian Charge d’ Affair was because Naoroji, Bhownaggree, and others
in the ZTFE, together with the Parsis of Bombay made it a high priority to
ameliorate the condition of the Zoroastrians in Qajar Iran. Due to the
subject matter of this paper, it is not feasible to give an account of the
conditions of Zoroastrians, down the ages, after the Arab conquest of
Iran. Nevertheless, it is important to mention that active persecution of
Zoroastrians in Iran began with the Abbasid Caliphs in the ninth century,
[10]
and continued under every dynasty before and including the Qajars. G. K.
Nariman in the early 1900’s was of the opinion, that the persecution of
Zoroastrians in Iran overall was not by the Arabs, but by their fellow
Iranian compatriots whose recent ancestors had previously converted to
Islam, thereby demonstrating their piety to the new faith.
[11]
It is for this reason that many Zoroastrians fled Iran. The best known of
these Zoroastrian refugees who fled Iran were the Parsis in India.
If it were not for the Hindus of India, it is highly doubtful there would
be any practising Zoroastrians found in Iran today or in any part of the
world! By the time Aga Muhammad Khan became the first Shah of the Qajar
Dynasty in 1796, the persecution of Zoroastrians was fine - tuned to such
an extent that the Zoroastrians were on the verge of extinction in their
homeland. It was only when Reza Pahlavi became Shah on 12th
December 1925 that all the discriminatory laws against Zoroastrians were
finally removed, with a few exceptions. During his reign, policies on
equal rights for Zoroastrians were enforced!
Rashid Shamardan in his
book, “Tarik-i Zarathushtrian Pas-as Sasanian” estimated that at the
beginning of the eighteenth century, there were half a million
Zoroastrians in Iran, mainly in Yazd and Kerman.
[12]
By 1854, one hundred and fifty years later, during the reign of Nasir al -
Din Shah Qajar the Zoroastrian population of Iran had dwindled to 7000.
[13]
Shamardan’s estimate obtained from the oral tradition amongst the
Zoroastrians is disputed, because official Iranian government figures put
their numbers substantially lower. However, as clearly demonstrated in a
Florida Court in 1993, relating to the 1920’s massacre by the Ku Klux Klan
of African Americans in the township of Rosewood, that the official count
of the dead dramatically differed with eye witness accounts of the period.
[14]
There is a similar discrepancy relating to the Armenian genocide that took
place in Turkey during 1915-1917, prior to the collapse of the Ottoman
Empire. The Armenians state that one and a half million were killed,
while the Turkish government puts the figure at three hundred thousand.
Furthermore, Turkey claims that the Armenians were guerrilla fighters, on
the side of Czarist Russia, which was fighting against Ottoman Turkey
during the First World War.
The reasons for this
dramatic decline were the total destruction of the Zoroastrian Gabr -
Mahalle in Ispahan in the era of Shah Hussein during the late Safavid
period
[15],
followed by the two Afghan invasions of Iran that toppled the Safavids in
1722. The Afghan army marched through Kerman rather then risk the deserts
of Seistan.
[16]
In the process, the Gabr - Mahalle in Kerman, located outside the
city gates, suffered the brunt of these attacks. The Afghans and in turn
the Safavids massacred the majority of the Zoroastrian population. Within
seven years, the Safavid dynasty was replaced by a tribal Afshar leader,
Nadir Qil Beg, who himself became Shah in 1736. Under Nadir Shah, the
Zoroastrians had two alternatives, renounce their ancestral faith or face
death.
[17]
In 1794, Kerman was plundered by the troops of Aga Muhammad Khan Qajar, as
a punishment for sheltering the last Zend ruler Luft Ali Khan. The
Zoroastrian population of Kerman were slaughtered,
[18]
their sacred books destroyed, and Gabr - Mahalle was laid to waste
forever.
[19]
It was reported that in Bam, Aga Muhammad personally tore out Luft Ali
Khan’s eyes thereby adding to his collection of thirty five thousand pairs
of eyes and six hunderd skulls, which was witnessed by Sir H. Pottinger in
1810, to mark his victory in Kerman.
[20]
Zoroastrians of Iran suffered gravely from the onset of Qajar rule.
However, the Qajars were not well prepared for the European predators,
chiefly amongst them Czarist Russia and Great Britain. The prestige of
Iran and its place in the world sank.
[21]
Wars with Czarist Russia, during the reign of Fath Ali Shah, reigned
1797 - 1834, ended with defeats for Iran. As a settlement, Armenia and
Azerbaijan were ceded to the Russians, together with the substantial loss
of land on each side of the Caspian Sea.
[22]
As the nineteenth century progressed, it became apparent that Iran was a
backward nation. The Qajar Shahs toured Europe seeking loans to modernise
Iran, because the country was virtually bankrupt.
[23]
Contrast this with the
Parsis, who unlike their Zoroastrian co- religionists back in Iran had
never been persecuted by the Hindus in India. As the nineteenth century
progressed, Great Britain with its Empire was the most powerful nation on
earth and India became the Crown Jewel in the Empire. In turn, the Parsis
became a very influential community in British India and because of their
‘Merchant Princes’, the community became immensely rich. Not only
the Parsis built Bombay for the British, but at times had defended the
city against the enemies of the British. In fact, Britain’s oldest Royal
Navy warship afloat is the 46-gun frigate HMS Trincomalee built in 1817 by
Parsi Wadia shipbuilders in Bombay. In return the British East India
Company promised the Parsis that they will never forcibly convert them
unlike the Portuguese, the previous European power to arrive in India.
This was a pragmatic policy because missionary activity would have been
bad for Company business. In short, the nineteenth century witnessed the
meteoric rise of the Parsi community. During the British Raj in India,
five Indians became baronets. The first three hereditary baronets,
created within twenty five years from 1857, were all Parsis. Hence, for
the first time after the Arabs overran Iran in the seventh century, there
was a group of Zoroastrians, who were in a position of real power and were
subjects of Great Britain the most powerful country in the world. In
addition, every Parsi knew then, as is the case today, why their ancestors
had fled Iran in the tenth century and had to seek refuge in an alien land
of India. Besides being fabulously rich, the Parsis as per the
Zoroastrian doctrine became linked with phenomenal charity work and the
phrase developed, “Parsi thy name is Charity”. Combined with the fact
that since the fifteenth century, as per the Persian Rivayats, the Parsis
were aware of the suffering of their fellow co - religionists back in
Iran, but at that time they were powerless to help. However, this was no
longer the case anymore!
Back in Iran, during the
reign of Nadir Shah 1736 - 1747, travel was officially forbidden for the
Zoroastrians, but extreme provocation led particular individuals to flee
overland to India. Due to the precarious journey, only the successful
ones lived to tell the tale. One such case was in 1796 of a Zoroastrian
named Kai Khusrau i-Yazdyar, who managed to secretly smuggle his beautiful
daughter Gulistan to Bombay. Gulistan had became an object of desire to a
wealthy Muslim of Yazd, thus to save her from abduction, which was quite
common for Zoroastrian women, she was smuggled to Bombay. It should be
noted, that the family of Kai Khusrau was one of only two Zoroastrian
families who succeeded in escaping trouble torn Kerman and made their way
to Yazd after the death of Karim Khan Zend in 1779, which once again threw
Iran into turmoil.
[24]
Gulistan and her father Kai Khusrau were assisted in Bombay by the
benevolent Edulji Dorabji Lashkari. Helped by the Lashkari family, Kai
Khusrau returned to Yazd three times and smuggled his entire family to
Bombay including his other two daughters. Subsequently, the beautiful
Gulistan married a Parsi, by the name of Framji Bhikaji Panday. Gulistan
had five sons and four daughters, who together with Kai Khusrau inspired
them and her wealthy husband Framji to assist fellow Zoroastrian
refugees. By the 1830s, increasing numbers of Zoroastrians were fleeing
Qajar Iran and coming to Bombay. In 1834, Gulistan’s eldest son, Burjorji,
started a fund to help these incoming Zoroastrian refugees.
[25]
In 1853, Gulistan’s third son, Meherwanji, started another fund in Bombay,
for the specific purpose of assisting the Zoroastrians in Qajar Iran.
This fund was called “The Society and Fund for the Amelioration of the
Condition of the Zoroastrians in Persia”, better known as the
“Amelioration Society”.
[26]
On 31st March
1854 the Amelioration Society, despatched their first agent,
Maneckji Limji Hataria, on a fact-finding mission to Qajar Iran. Hataria
was selected because he was experienced, self reliant and resourceful. He
was adaptable, honest and was patient during negotiation. His previous
job had required him to travel to Sind and other frontier outposts of
British India. Physically he was compact and sturdy and was built to
endure the prevalent rigors of life and travel. Hataria was given
explicit instructions, to inquire into and report upon the social,
political and intellectual conditions of the Zoroastrians in Qajar Iran.
[27]
Hataria landed at Bushire in the Persian Gulf in April 1854 at the age of
41. On 11th January 1855, the Amelioration Society
called a public meeting in Bombay to consider the resolutions to be
adopted on the report submitted by Hataria.
The report was extremely
distressing and stated that the lives of the Zoroastrians in Iran had no
value. Murders and assaults on the Zoroastrians went unpunished, rape and
abduction of their women was common. The most alarming content of
Hataria’s report was the dwindling population of Zoroastrians resulting
from forceful conversions. Only 7200 Zoroastrian individuals remained in
Iran, 6658 in Yazd and its villages, Kerman had only 450, while Tehran had
50 and a few in Shiraz. Discriminatory laws existed to pressurise
Zoroastrians to give up their ancestral faith.
[28]
For instance, the law of inheritance stated that a Zoroastrian who
converted to Islam collected the lion share or all the inheritance of the
deceased, while the other brothers and sisters who steadfastly remained
Zoroastrians, got nothing.
[29]
This meant that the Muslim husband who had abducted a Zoroastrian woman
and forcibly converted her before marriage was now entitled to her
inheritance.
An account of forceful mass
conversions, was related to Professor Mary Boyce when she visited the
Zoroastrians in the villages of Yazd during 1963 - 1964;
“Virtually nothing can be
learnt of Sharifabad and Turkabad during the eighteenth and early
nineteenth centuries; but in the mid nineteenth century disaster overtook
Turkabad, in the shape of what was perhaps the last massed forcible
conversion in Iran, possibly during the reign of Fath Ali Shah (1797 -
1834). It no longer seems possible to learn anything about the background
of this event; but it happened, so it is said, one autumn day when
dye-madder - then one of the chief local crops - was being lifted. All
the able - bodied men were at working teams in the fields when a body of
Moslems swooped on the village and seized them. They were threatened, not
only with death for themselves, but also with the horrors that would
befall their women and children, who were being terrorised at the same
time in their homes; and by the end of the day of violence most of the
village had accepted Islam. To recant after a verbal acknowledgement of
Allah and his prophet meant death in those days, and so Turkabad was lost
to old religion. Its fire - temple was razed to the ground, and only a
rough, empty enclosure remained where once it had stood.”
[30]
Zoroastrians were forbidden
to have basic education, even on their own religion, or rebuild their
places of worship. The height of Zoroastrian houses were restricted and
should be low enough for any Muslim to touch the roof with the hand
extended. Only two windows per room while bad-girs or air-cooling
towers were forbidden, without which the summer heat of the Yazdi desert
was unbearable. Besides being illegal to trade, all Zoroastrians had to
walk in the town, but could not walk in the bazaar. Riding a horse was
forbidden, and even in the desert, a Zoroastrian had to dismount from his
donkey whenever he met a Muslim. Zoroastrians were forbidden to wear
trousers instead had to wear self-coloured tight knickers, while they had
to wear a special somewhat peculiarly hideous shoe with a broad turned -
up toe. Zoroastrians were forced to wear clothes only of dull yellow,
brown and grey colours, had to wear a torn cap and carrying an umbrella
was forbidden. Zoroastrians were prevented from wearing rings or even
wearing spectacles. The harshest of all these anti Zoroastrian laws,
reported Hataria, was the payment of the jizya or the poll tax.
Initially, the jizya was a tax paid by the dhimmis, non -
Muslims, to their Muslim overlords as a means of exemption from military
service. Nevertheless, in practice and in hands of unscrupulous tax
collectors the jizya tax was used as a harsh tool of oppression and
enforced conversions of Zoroastrians.
[31]
A decade earlier, in 1843
during the reign of Muhammad Shah Qajar (1834 - 1848), the famous Danish
scholar Westagaard, visited the beleaguered Zoroastrian community of
Kerman. He noted that the jizya tax for the Zoroastrians set by
the imperial court in Tehran had risen to 660 tomans. However, since
several intermediaries demanded their share, the poll tax had increased by
over 200% to 2000 tomans. In 1843 there were 1000 Zoroastrians living in
Kerman, out of these only 200 could pay without difficulty, 400 with much
trouble and for the rest it was impossible even under the pain of death.
[32]
The most distressing scenes ensued at the time of collection for those who
could not pay. They were mercilessly beaten, their children tortured in
front of their eyes and forcibly converted to Islam.
[33]
It is important to note, Westagaard’s figure of 1000 Zoroastrians in 1843,
while Hataria reported 450 in 1855, therefore within 12 years the
population of Kerman had dwindled by over 50%. The impact of Hataria
coming to Iran was significant, because by 1878, under the governorship of
Vekil ul-Mulk, the Kerman population had increased to 1341.
[34]
According to information
related to Napier Malcolm, who resided in Yazd from 1900 - 1905, the
jizya had to be paid on the spot whenever the tax collector met the
Zoroastrian. He was not even allowed to go home to fetch the money. If
the money was not given, the Zoroastrian would be beaten until it was
given. Napier Malcolm mentions an incident related to him, of a collector
who tied a Zoroastrian to a dog and gave a blow to each one in turn.
[35]
It is important to recognise the dislike of dogs originates from the
liking of dogs by Zoroastrians. In Zoroastrianism, the dog is man’s
assistant, as it helps man in the eternal fight against evil unlike the
cat. Hence it was mandatory for Zoroastrians when they converted, to
destroy their kusti, the sacred girdle worn around the waist, kick the dog
and spit into the fire. Incidentally, it was bad manners for a
Zoroastrian to spit, especially in the river, while kicking a pregnant
bitch was a capital offence in Sasanian Iran.
[36]
As expected the Parsis in
Bombay were shocked upon hearing Hataria’s report. Some felt that Hataria
should bring the remaining Zoroastrians to Bombay. However, the majority
felt that the Parsis of India must not remain indifferent to the harsh
treatment of their fellow co - religionists in Iran and more forceful
action was required. An article penned by the historian Dosabhai Framji
Karaka described the mood of the Parsi community, after being made aware
of Hataria’s report;
“But can we ourselves do
nothing for our unfortunate co-religionists in Persia? Our community
possesses considerable weight, and includes, amongst its members, names
known all over the world for their exertions in the case of humanity, and
the amelioration of the condition of their countrymen generally. A
deputation, therefore, of our race to the Persian Court, duly accredited
by the British Ambassador at Tehran, might we believe, remonstrate with
success against the cruelties now practised upon our Zoroastrian brethren
in Persia. The amount raised by the capitation - tax now levied upon
them, and which is attended by circumstances of such cruelty, must be, to
the imperial revenue, insignificant in the extreme, and it is not
improbable that a dignified representation on the subject, made by a
suitable embassy from the Parsis of India, might succeed in abolishing
it. Persian princes seldom knew the true state of their subjects, and we
cannot but think that our countrymen would reflect honour upon themselves
by an effort to relieve the miseries of our Zoroastrian brethren in the
fatherland.”
[37]
During the public meeting,
a third fund was spontaneously established, known as the Persian
Amelioration Fund to finance Hataria’s work in Iran.[38]
This fund was under the chairmanship of Sir Dinshaw Petit, the second
Indian to be made a baronet, who also happened to be the husband of
Sakarbai, one of Gulistan’s daughters. The Amelioration Society
instructed Hataria, that his primary objective must be, at all cost, the
abolishment of the obnoxious jizya tax, while the secondary
objective was the removal all discrimination against the Zoroastrians in
Iran. The campaign for the abolition of the jizya tax commenced in
1857 and lasted for twenty five years.[39]
Hataria worked with missionary zeal to achieve his objective. Like all
Parsis, Hataria was a British subject, therefore under the protection of
the British ambassador to Iran, the well-known Sir Henry Rawlinson, with
whom he had excellent relations. He set up headquarters in Tehran and
established contacts with people who mattered in Qajar court circles and
made respectful submissions and representations. The ministers, court
officials and governors were lavished with presents solely with the view
to achieving the objectives set by the Amelioration Society. With
great patience and perseverance, Hataria waited three long years, before
he ultimately succeeded, through the offices of Rawlinson, in obtaining
his first audience with Nasir al-Din Shah, which took place on 15th
May 1860. Initially, Hataria was asked to present himself at the Qajar
Court with the petition from India on 14th May 1860. He was
accompanied with Sir Henry Rawlinson, and six other Parsis and waited all
day to see the Shah, but in vain. The next morning Hataria was there
again and after waiting until 3pm, was summoned alone to meet the Shah.
Later Hataria described the
meeting to Rawlinson;
After bowing to the Shah several times, Hataria stood a distance of about
20 steps from the Shah.
Nasir al-Din Shah exclaimed, “Is this Manekji?”
Hataria bowed low and said, “Yes, I am the one who is always willing to
sacrifice himself in the bejewelled dust of Your Majesty’s feet.”
At this stage, the Shah had a short conversation with his courtiers.
Meanwhile Hataria advanced step by step towards the Shah and placing the
silver casket at his feet, removed the cover.
Hataria opened the address sent by the akabars, the leaders, of the
Parsi community of Bombay, which was wrapped in brocade, and displayed it
to the Shah.
After it was replaced in the silver casket , the Shah enquired,
“Do you know Farsi?”
“Yes, Kebla of the World”, replied Hataria.
The Shah enquired, “Do you belong to the Zoroastrian tribe? Is your
religion Zoroastrian?”
“Yes, Protector of the World” replied Hataria.
The Shah asked, “What are the main directives of your religion?”
Hataria responded, “The main directives are similar to the Shariat
of Islam. There is some difference in the prayers. But in essence both
are the same.”
At this stage the Shah addressed the amirs standing in front right
row; “These people are good, pure and holy and have survived from very
ancient times”.
Then the Shah asked Hataria, “Are you worshippers of fire?”
Hataria replied, “No, Your Majesty. We consider the atash, the
fire, as the Kebla, in the same way that the followers of Islam
consider Kaaba in Mecca as the Kebla.”
“What , you do not consider fire as God Himself?” enquired the Shah.
Hataria responded “No Your Majesty. One must know God through his
creation. Water, fire, sun, moon are all created by Him. Through them we
worship the Creator Himself.”
“Then don’t you worship the fire?” enquired the surprised Nasir al-Din
Shah.
“No Your Majesty. We stand in front of the Fire or the Sun and offer
prayers to their Creator” replied Hataria.
“Why do you pray standing in front of the fire?” enquired the Shah.
Hataria replied, “These are noorani, lustrous objects. We consider
each lustrous ray, a ray from the Holy Creator. Hence we consider it best
to offer prayers in front of these manifestations of the Creator Himself.”
“You mean roshni, light?” asked the Shah.
“Yes Your Majesty.” informed Hataria,
The Shah enquired, “Do you follow roza? Do you fast?”
Hataria responded, “No Your Majesty. We do not remain hungry during the
day and eat well after sunset as do the followers of Islam. But, we have
directions to eat a few morsels less and give the food so saved to the
poor.”
The Shah enquired, “Do you undergo nekah while taking a wife?”
Hataria replied, “Yes, Your Majesty. Like the followers of Islam we too
have nekah. Our mobeds tie the nuptial knots.”
The Shah enquired, “Do you perform nemaz?”
Hataria replied, “Yes, Your Majesty, we follow the directions of the
Creator and offer prayers six times during the day and night.”
The Shah asked, “Are you a tradesman?”
Hataria responded, “Yes, Your Majesty, I trade on a small scale. But the
main work of this servant is to guide the few remaining Zoroastrians of
Iran on behalf of the Parsi akabars of India.”
The Shah enquired, “In what occupation are the Parsis of India
mainly involved?”
Hataria responded, “Most of them are traders. A few are writers in the
service of the English.”
After asking a few more questions, Nasir al-Din Shah observed, “The people
of this group are very loyal and are originally of Iranian descent.”
Concluding the meeting, Hataria made the following submission:-
“I am one who is always willing to sacrifice himself at His Majesty’s
feet. Though the Parsis of India have, over a long period, been
away from the Iranian land, still they consider the Shah of Iran as ‘a
shadow of the Creator’ and have kept friendly relations with Iran. Hence,
in this royal durbar as splendid as King Solomon’s, this small
representation is like an insect flying at night. We pray that it be
sympathetically considered by Your Majesty.”
“Very well, very well”, responded Nasir al-Din Shah.
When the Shah saw Hataria following Qajar court practices, he exclaimed,
“This person appears to be noble and deserving.”
In this first audience with Nasir al-Din Shah, Hataria created an
excellent impression.
By 1860, the jizya tax
had risen to 1020 tomans. After Hataria’s meeting with the Shah, the
tax was reduced by 100 tomans. After a lot of pleading, through his
contacts with Rawlinson and the French ambassador, Count de Gobineau,
Hataria obtained an agreement for the entire amount to be remitted from
Bombay, directly to the treasury in Tehran. Hence preventing the excesses
of the tax collectors in Yazd and Kerman, as earlier reported by
Westergaad and Napier Malcolm.[40]
By 1882 the amount of jizya to be collected was reduced gradually
to 845 tomans. Finally, in August 1882, during the Muslim month of Ramzan,
Nasir al-Din Shah issued the royal firman decreeing the immediate
abolition of the jizya tax. The English translation of the text of
the firman is the following;[41]
“In consideration of the
innumerable benedictions which it has pleased the Almighty to accord us,
and as an act of grace towards Him who has given us the Royal Crown of
Persia, with the means of promoting the welfare of its inhabitants, there
has devolved on us the duty of securing tranquillity and happiness for all
our subjects, to whatever tribe, community, or religion they belong, so
that they may be profited and refreshed by the beneficent waters of our
special favour.
“Amongst these are the
Zoroastrians of Yazd and Kerman, who descended from the ancient and noble
race of Persia, and it is now our desire to make their peace and well
being more complete than before.
“That is why, by this royal
firman, we ordain and command that taxes imposts of the Crown,
levied previously on our Musulman subjects of Yazd and Kerman, may be
recovered in the same way from the Zoroastrians who reside there. In this
manner the impost, which exacts from this community the sum of eight
hundred and forty - five tomans, is abolished, and in the commencement of
this propitious year of the Horse, we make an abatement of this sum and
free the Zoroastrians from it forever. We therefore order and command our
mustaufis and officers of the debt of the Royal Exchequer to remove
it from the revenues, which have to be paid in by the Yazd and Kerman.
The governors now in office, or who will be nominated subsequently, at the
head of these provinces, ought to consider all the right to the payment of
this tribute abolished for ever, and as regards the present year, and
following years, if the sum should happen to be extracted, they will be
held responsible and will be punished for it. Moreover, in the tribute of
the tithes and imposts of water and land, and for all trade duties, the
Zoroastrians must be treated in the same manner as our other subjects.
“Given at Tehran in the
month of Ramzan, 1299. (August 1882)”
In order to maintain this
long struggle of twenty five years to abolish the jizya tax, the
Parsis of India had donated to the Persian Amelioration Fund
£109,564 sterling / rupees, or as per current value in 2000 would be just
under US$ 10 million dollars / £5.5 million sterling.42
During these twenty five years it took to abolish the jizya tax
Hataria was not idle, as he was not the type of person who spend his time
solely on patient diplomacy while practical tasks needed urgently to be
done.43 Besides the jizya tax countless other
difficulties faced the Zoroastrians. For instance, they were forbidden to
renovate their places of worship. In 1855, within one year of his
arrival, the first task Hataria undertook, was to restore and extend the
ancient Atash Behram building in the city of Yazd.44 Two years
later, in 1857, the Atash Behram of Kerman was rebuilt again from money
that was pouring in from the Parsis of India. Snuffing out consecrated
fires in Zoroastrian fire temples was very common in the centuries
following the Arab conquest of Iran, therefore the fire temple buildings
in many villages of Yazd and Kerman from the outside looked similar to any
other village houses. At times, for extra protection of the very old
fires, only a handful knew where the real consecrated fire was located, so
as to prevent a Zoroastrian convert to Islam from revealing the exact
location. It is because of such intense secrecy that the oldest fire
burning today in Iran is Adur Farnbag, that was originally
enthroned in Firuzabad, Fars and has been burning continuously since
Parthian times for at least two and a half thousand years.45
For comparison the oldest consecrated on Indian soil has been burning
for over a thousand years in the village of Udvada, South Gujarat.
Besides renovating fire
temples, Adarians, in the villages of Yazd and Kerman, Hataria
built new high walled dakhmas or towers of silence by 1864. Thus
preventing desecration by the local thuggish element that would remove the
body from the dakhmas and drag it in the streets. Hataria also
erected buildings and installed water tanks at the annual pilgrimage
shrines at Pir e-Sabz and Banu Pars, located deep in the
Yazdi desert.46 Both these Pirs are named after the
daughters of Yazdigard III. They commemorate the event, when Ahura Mazda
upon hearing the princess's prayers opened the mountain, hence preventing
the Sasanian princesses from being captured by the Arab forces.47
Another important area
Hataria concentrated, was the setting up of schools for Zoroastrians,
because education was forbidden to them. By 1857, only three years after
Hataria’s arrival, schools for Zoroastrian boys were set up in Yazd and
Kerman. The opposition from local Muslims was intense, who saw no reason
for the despised Guebres to be educated. In 1870 the ban on
Zoroastrian schools was lifted. By 1882 there were twelve Zoroastrian
schools set up in Iran and included villages schools and a boarding school
in Tehran, staffed by qualified Parsi teachers from India offering secular
education based on reading, writing and arithmetic.48 By the
early twentieth century, Zoroastrian men of Iran, who had been illiterate
for centuries, were the first to be universally literate in secular
education. Later, this universal literacy excelled Zoroastrians to new
heights under Reza Shah Pahlavi, when virtually all restrictions against
them were removed.
In Zoroastrianism there is
spiritual gender equality, therefore in India, Parsis were pioneers of
schools for girls in the nineteenth century. Thus the Parsi women in
India were emancipated decades before the women in Great Britain.
Subsequently, in the early part of the twentieth century Arbab Kaihosrow
Jehanyan started a school for one hundred Zoroastrian girls in Yazd and
here the Muslim opposition was very fierce, especially from the clergy.
By the 1930’s one third of the intake at the Zoroastrian school for girls
in Tehran were high ranking Muslims, because their parents were impressed
by the standard of education. Also they would not be indoctrinated as was
the case in some Christian mission schools.49 During the reign
of Reza Shah, Muslims children attended the Zoroastrian village schools in
Yazd and Kerman. However because the Muslims perceived the Zoroastrians
to be unclean, separate drinking water containers were installed for them
and even during lunch they would sit in separate areas and food was not
shared between them.50
In 1854, when Hataria
landed in Bushire, fifty Zoroastrians lived in Tehran, while others came
for seasonal work. By 1864, within ten years of Hataria presence and
notoriety, Tehran had abandoned its contempt for Zoroastrians. Besides
building a school, a guesthouse was built for Zoroastrians in Villa Avenue
in central Tehran together with a dakhma on the outskirts of
Tehran, where currently the Zoroastrian aramgah or burial grounds
are located. As Bombay was for the Parsis, it was Tehran that made the
Zoroastrians of Iran wealthy. Due to Hataria’s vision, vast amounts of
barren land were acquired in the late nineteenth and early twentieth
century at very cheap rates, because nobody else wanted it. However, when
Tehran experienced the housing boom after the Second World War, these
tracks of land were worth millions of tomans.
Besides lobbying the
ambassadors of Britain, France, Russia, and USA, for them to bring
pressure on the Qajar Court, Hataria dialogued with the religious
authorities, stressing the Islamic concept of justice in the hope of
softening attitudes towards the beleaguered Zoroastrians. Not
unexpectedly, there was no reversal of policy, even when Hataria
highlighted specific instances of murder, abduction and persecution of
Zoroastrians to their attention. Nevertheless, the clergy were adamant
that Islamic laws were not being infringed by the Muslim community of
Iran.51
Hataria placed a very high
priority on the marriage of Zoroastrian women, because of the constant
threat of abduction and forced conversions leading to marriages with
Muslims and thus the girls were lost to the family forever. Hataria
condemned this practice during his dialogue with the clergy. Between 1856
and 1865, over a hundred poor or orphaned girls of marriageable age were
wedded to Zoroastrians and the cost of marriage paid by the
Amelioration Society.52 At times Hataria personally would
bear the cost of these marriages. Even after centuries of persecution,
the Zoroastrians of Iran are still proud people and do not accept
handouts, therefore noted Hataria that some of these young women chose to
remain unwed, rather then somebody else pay for their marriage.53
Hataria had also noted that
within ten years after his arrival in Iran and despite improvement, five
Zoroastrians were murdered, seven wounded and tortured, between thirty to
forty severally assaulted, one hundred houses of Zoroastrian were
plundered and countless others robbed.54 Sadly there was no
redress for the Zoroastrian victims. Murderers of Zoroastrians were never
prosecuted. This can be best described by an incident that occurred in
Yazd in 1870. Two lutis attacked two Zoroastrians. The head
master of the Zoroastrian School in the village of Taft in Yazd was
murdered, while the other badly wounded as his attackers tried to cut off
his head. By coincidence, Hataria happened to be in Yazd, therefore the
criminals were caught. However, the Governor dared not proceed against
them in order not to upset the Shia theologians, Mujtahids, because
one of them happened to be a Seyid. Hence, Hataria persuaded the
Governor to let him take both the perpetrators to Tehran for trial. In
Tehran, the Mujtahid petitioned the Shah, they received the
bastinado and were freed. Upon inquiring, Hataria was informed by the
Vizier that under the law no Muslim can be killed for killing a Guebre.
Hataria then enquired whether it was true that the blood - price of a
Zoroastrian was set at just seven tomans. The official reply he got was
that it would be slightly more.55 This Seyid was seen
again in Taft by Napier Malcolm in August 1901, still roaming openly with
his gang of lutis.56 Upon intense pressure being
brought on the authorities, there was some improvement after the abolition
of the jizya in 1882, because Yazd had strong governors who were
friendly towards the Zoroastrians. Napier Malcolm reports that in 1885, a
Seyid murdered a Zoroastrian woman in Yazd. He was arrested and
upon orders of the Governor of Isfahan, Zill us-Sultan, the elder brother
of Nasir al - Din Shah, the Seyid was executed before daybreak.
When the Mullas found out in the morning, they ordered slaughter of
every Zoroastrian in Yazd. Luckily none were murdered but many were
injured.57
Abduction of young
Zoroastrian women, followed by forceful conversion and marriage to Muslims
was a reality in Iran. Once this happened there was no redress for the
victim or her family. Thus many of them, even married women, before
leaving their houses, would blacken their teeth and disfigure their faces
with dirt.58 The famous English scholar E. G. Browne, during
his travels in 1887 - 1888, reports a case he witnessed in Yazd of the
attempted rape of a married Zoroastrian woman, leading to her murder. He
was astonished when the two culprits although apprehended, were never
prosecuted, because of the intimidation of the witnesses by the local
Mullahs.59 In 1899 a Muslim servant was executed by the
governor of Yazd for abduction and rape of a Zoroastrian woman. Since the
perpetrator was not a Seyid there were no disturbances. Even as late as
the 1960’s this practice continued as reported by Professor Boyce;
“Another example was the
village of Abshahi, on the southern outskirts of Yazd where the last
Zoroastrian family left in 1961, after the rape and subsequent suicide of
one of their daughters.”60
“Last Zoroastrian family,
four brothers and a sister were tenant farmers, left the village of
Biyabanak in early 1900, to save sister from attentions of a local
Moslem.”61
Professor Farhang Mehr in a
recent article titled, “Causes of Decline of Iran’s Zarathushti Population
since Nineteenth Century”, list abduction of Zoroastrian girls by Muslims
as the third reason for the decline of the Zoroastrain population in
Iran. Professor Mehr, Chancellor of Shiraz University, was one of the
most influential Zoroastrians and held various ministerial positions
including that of Deputy Prime Minister during the reign of Mohammed Reza
Shah Pahlavi. As the President of the Tehran Anjuman in 1965, Mehr
personally dealt with cases of abduction where the Prime Minister Hoveyda
and Muhammad Reza Shah ordered an investigation. Unlike the Muslims,
Zoroastrian women were easily distinguishable because of their particular
style of clothing and they did not veil their faces. In addition, in
Zoroastrianism, men and women freely mix; they dance together and consume
alcohol on religious festivals since the days of the legendary King
Jamsheed. Due to this lifestyle, a myth developed that Zoroastrian women
were promiscuous, hence easy targets for abduction. In reality, as noted
by European travellers, the Zoroastrian women were renowned for their
chastity in Iran as well as in India.62
Being a British subject,
Hataria was under the protection of the British Ambassador to Iran.
Nevertheless, there were several attempts on his life, but despite these,
he managed to survive to the age of seventy seven. Hataria passed away in
Tehran on 15th February 1890, seven years after the abolition
of the jizya tax. His body was consigned to the local towers of
silence. Sadly, after his death, Hataria’s only son Hormusji was murdered
in Bander Abbas.63 Even in his old age, Hataria commitment to
the amelioration of the Zoroastrians of Iran was total, because many of
the discriminatory laws against Zoroastrians still remained. By the time
Hataria died, majority of these laws were abolished. The memory of
Hataria and his work is still remembered today by the Zoroastrians of
Iran. His achievements were unprecedented. Hataria had undertaken a task
reported to be “beyond human capacity.” Gobineau, the French ambassador
had said;
“There was needed nothing
short of a miracle to save the Guebres as the Zoroastrians were
called by the followers of Islam. Manekji Limji Hataria performed that
miracle!” There should be no doubt that the it is because of the work of
Maneckji Limji Hataria and others like him that Zoroastrianism in Iran
continues to be practised today, three and a half thousand years after the
advent of the Iranian prophet Zarathushtra. For this reason Hataria can
be rightly called Martin Luther King of the Zoroastrians of Iran. As a
mark of respect a golden bust of Hataria is placed on a pedestal in the
compound of the Atash Behram in Yazd for all to see.
As was the case that, after
the demise of Martin Luther King, the struggle for African American civil
rights continued! Similarly the struggle to ameliorate the Zoroastrians
of Iran continued after the death of Hataria. It lasted until December
1925, when General Reza Khan became Reza Shah Pahlavi. After the death of
Hataria, Kaikhosru Tirandaz Khoorsund, an Iranian and a graduate of Bombay
University, became the second agent of the Amelioration Society in 1891,
followed by Ardeshir ReporterS who in time became a very
close and influential friend of Reza Shah. It should be noted that the
obnoxious jizya tax was only one of the laws that was used to
persecute the Zoroastrians in Iran. Although the jizya was
abolished in 1882, there were other laws just as obnoxious that made the
Zoroastrians easily identifiable in order to pressurise them to convert to
Islam or simply used to humiliate them, especially in Yazd and Kerman,
which was the “deep south red neck country” for the Zoroastrians. The
list of anti Zoroastrian laws is long and examples are well documented,
for instance up to 1860, Zoroastrians could not engage in trade. Later
they were allowed to trade in caravanserais or hostelries, but even as
late as 1905 they were forbidden to trade in bazaars or in linen drapery.
Up to 1880, the Zoroastrians had to wear self-coloured tight knickers and
were forbidden to wear trousers. They were banned from wearing white
stocking and had to wear a special kind of peculiarly hideous shoe with a
broad turned - up toe. Napier Malcolm was informed that in 1860, a 70
year old Zoroastrian was beaten up in Yazd for wearing a pair of white
trousers, his trousers were removed and was send home with them under his
arm. In 1891, he reported, a Mujtahid in Yazd ordered the beating
of a Zoroastrian, because the man was wearing white stocking that were
taken off. Note this was eleven years after it was permitted for them to
wear white stockings. Up to 1882, the height of Zoroastrians houses were
restricted and should be low enough for any Muslim to touch the roof with
the hand extended. There was a maximum of two windows per room and only
single doors were allowed, while the walls had to be splashed with white
round the door. As late as 1900, the Muslims in Yazd made sure that not a
single Zoroastrian house installed a bad - gir or air-cooling
tower, without which the summer heat of the Yazdi desert was unbearable.
Up to 1885, Zoroastrians were prevented from wearing rings, their girdle
had to be made of rough canvass. They had to wear a torn cap and were
forbidden to carry an umbrella. Napier Malcolm reports that during his
stay in 1905, twenty years after it was permissible, no Zoroastrians would
dare be seen with an umbrella in Yazd. Up to 1891, all Zoroastrians had
to walk in the town, while in the desert they had to dismount from their
donkey, as riding a horse was forbidden, whenever they met any Muslims.64
By 1900, this law was relaxed and Zoroastrians only had to dismount when
they met a high-ranking Muslim. Up to 1896, a Zoroastrian was forced to
twist his turban instead of folding it. Up to 1898, the Zoroastrians were
forced to wear clothes only of dull yellow, brown and grey colours. After
1898, clothes in bright colours such as black, blue, green and red were
not permitted. Besides colour, there were numerous other dress
restrictions.
The Minute Books and Annual
Reports of the Zoroastrian Trust Funds of Europe highlight that between
1873 and 1926, the Zoroastrians of Britain, on behalf of their co -
religionists in Iran, and in conjunction with the Parsis of Bombay made
six Deputations to the Shahs of Iran.65 The first Deputation
was made to Nasir al-Din Shah Qajar, at Buckingham Palace on 24th
June 1873. The Parsi delegation jointly headed by the President of
the ZTFE, Dadabhai Naoroji, and Senior Trustee Ardeshir Khurshetji Wadia,
who was the first Indian to visit USA and also first to be elected to the
Royal Society of Great Britain.66 It was upon the insistence
of the Empress of India, Queen Victoria, that Nasir al-Din Shah Qajar met
the Parsi delegation. The address drawn up in the most florid and
courteous style such as Oriental etiquette demands, supported by the
British Ambassador to Tehran, Sir Henry Rawlinson and Mr. E.B. Eastwick MP
was presented to the Shah. Nasir al-Din Shah Qajar, reigned 1848 - 1896,
responded by informing the delegation that he was familiar with complaints
regarding his Zoroastrian subjects and would consider the means of
ameliorating their position in Iran. Sadly, in spite of the friendly
promises by Nasir al-Din Shah, the address had little impact compared to
later deputations and petitions and the amount of jizya was not
reduced.
In 1886, Muzaffar al-Din
Shah, reigned 1896 - 1907, succeeded the assassinated Nasir al - Din
Shah. In 1898, Muzaffar al-Din issued an imperial firman, revoking
all the remaining discriminating laws against the Zoroastrians of Iran.
However, the firman had little effect in Yazd or Kerman because of
the Mujtahids and their feared bands of lutis often headed
by Seyids. The Zoroastrians in Yazd would still be beaten up for
accidentally touching with their clothes some fruit exposed for sale in
the bazaar, because in the eyes of the Muslims, the fruit was now deemed
to be unclean and therefore unfit of consumption by true believers.67
Nevertheless, for the first time since the Arab conquest of Iran, the
Zoroastrians were not discriminated as noted by the American scholar A.V.W.
Jackson.68
The second Deputation was
at the Royal Palace Hotel when Muzaffar al-Din Shah Qajar visited Ostend
during his European tour in 1900. Muzaffar al-Din Shah, like his
father Nasir al-Din Shah was visiting Europe to obtain loans for improving
Iran. But unlike his father, Muzaffar al-Din Shah was pleased to receive
the illuminated address, bounded in a handsome volume with full oriental
protocol from the Parsi delegation, because in 1892 Naoroji became the
first Asian and Zoroastrian to be elected a MP. In 1900 Bhownaggree was
made a Knight, he was also a sitting MP, who had been re - elected with an
increased majority, in the parliament of Great Britain, the most powerful
country in the world. Hence the Parsis of Great Britain were in a
position of influence! Furthermore, the Shah was presented with two more
bounded illuminated addresses, one from Bombay through Sir Dinshaw Petit,
head of the Society for the Amelioration of Conditions of the
Zoroastrians in Persia, on behalf of the Parsis of India. The other
on behalf of the Zoroastrians of Iran and was send from Tehran through
Ardeshir E. Reporter, the third agent of the Amelioration Society.69
Muzaffar al-Din Shah gave his assurance to not only protect but also
promote the interests of his Zoroastrian subjects.70 Due to
the constant pressure by the Zoroastrians from outside Iran and also from
European powers, the new governors Yazd, after 1882 and more so after
1900, were instructed from Tehran to ensure the security of the Shah’s
Zoroastrian subjects.
On 6th December
1906, a third address was send to the gravely ill Muzaffar al-Din Shah
through the offices of His Highness Sadre Azam in Tehran forwarded by the
Charge d’ Affairs of Persian Legation in London. The address was once
again drawn up by Bhownaggree, who by then belonged to the ‘Order of the
Lion and Sun of Persia’ and covered an engrossed resolution passed by the
Zoroastrians of Britain. It read;71
“At a Special General
Meeting of Parsees resident in Great Britain invited by this Fund on
Monday the 15th October 1906, the following resolution was
unanimously passed.
Proposed by Dadabhai
Naoroji, Esquire,
Seconded by Sir Mancherjee M. Bhownaggree, K.C.I.E., Order of the Lion and
the Sun.
Resolution: “That the
Parsees resident in the United Kingdom, in Special General Meeting
assembled, have received with the greatest satisfaction a message from
Tehran that the Zoroastrian subjects of the Persian Empire have seen
accorded by His Imperial Majesty the Shah-en-Shah the privilege of
representation in the Parliament established by the order of His Majesty
and that one of their most Distinguished Members, Arbab Jamsheed, has been
elected as their representative; and that this Meeting is unanimously of
opinion that the best thanks of the community be respectfully conveyed to
His Imperial Majesty for his broad minded act of justice towards his
Zoroastrian subjects.”
Once again protocol and
care for detail was of the utmost importance, as highlighted in the draft
copy of the typed resolution where Bhownaggree inserts the words “the Shah
-en-Shah”, instead of “the Shah”. Similarly, in the letter to Prince
Sadre Azam attached to the resolution, where he is reminds Muzaffar al-Din
Shah of his previous assurance to protect and promote the interest of his
Zoroastrian subjects, the word “Excellency” is replaced by “Highness”.
Bhownaggree finishes the letter with the words “Obedient Humble Servant”.
Furthermore, in the covering letter to the Charge d’Affairs, Bhownaggree
enquires about the Shah’s health and writes; “I have seen with deepest
concern reports about the indisposition of His Imperial Majesty, and also
noticed the later news with much relief that His Majesty is now much
better. I hope your latest authoritative news is re - assuring on the
subject. With best wishes for His Majesty’s complete recovery and long
life, and with sentiments of respect for your Excellency, I am Yours very
faithfully M. M. Bhownaggree.”
The Persian Charge
d’Affairs, who a few months earlier had been invited as a distinguished
guest for the Pateti Banquet on 14th September 1906,
promptly acknowledges the receipt of the address on 8th
December 1906.72 Recognising the importance of this third
address to Iran’s image abroad and with it the importance of the
Zoroastrians being British MPs he states;
“I am sure that it will be
gratifying to His Imperial Majesty to see that his endeavours to further
the well being of his Zoroastrians subjects, whose welfare He has so much
at heart, are appreciated by their co-religionists in this country (Great
Britain).”
The Charge d’Affairs
concludes the letter by thanking Bhownaggree for enquiring about the
health of his “August Master” and informs him that;
“The last news I had on the
subject was, I am glad to say of a reassuring nature”. However, within a
few months after this reply, Muzzarfar al-Din Shah passed away. He was
succeeded by Muhammad Ali Shah who, although was hostile to the Majlis,
did ensure that in the new Majlis there continued to be a Zoroastrian
representative, Arbab Jamshid.
The fourth Address was on
the accession of Muhammad Ali Shah Qajar.73 It was drawn and
presented by Bhownaggree, to “His Excellency Moshir al-Mulke who was the
envoy deputed to the Court of St. James to announce officially the
accession of His Imperial Majesty the Shah”. According to the Minute
Book, the presentation took place at the Criterion Restaurant on 26th
June 1907 and records, “at the request of the Zoroastrians of Persia, the
Managing Committee of our Fund thought it very desirable in the interest
of the Parsees of Persia to give a reception”. Present at this reception
was the President of the Amelioration Society, Sir Dinshaw Petit,
who followed with an address on behalf of the Society based in Bombay.
Petit conveyed “to His Imperial Majesty the respectful congratulations of
the whole Parsi community on his accession to the throne of our ancient
Fatherland”, thereby demonstrating that bonds between the Parsi community
and their ancestral homeland are just as strong as they were when they
fled Iran for India as religious refugees a thousand years ago. Petit
continued, “with our eternal prayer that the Shah may be blessed with
health, and strength to rule over his people for many long years, and that
the Shah may grant to our co-religionists who are subject to his
sovereignty the same rights, privileges, and protection which His Majesty
has evinced his desire to extend the Persian nation under the constitution
which has been recently inaugurated in his Empire”. Petit recognised the
assurances given by the Muhammad Ali Shah, because he mentions the
“unmistakable proof already given” to protect the welfare of the
Zoroastrians of Iran by granting Arbab Jamshid the privilege of
representation in the new Majlis to the gratitude of all Parsis. Petit
concludes by assuring the Shah that “every measure of justice, of generous
kindness and above all of assured protection of their lives (of the
Zoroastrians) and property will be gratefully repaid by their increasing
loyalty and devotion to His Majesty’s throne and august person”.
The impact of these
deputations to the Qajar Shahs for the Zoroastrians in Iran were
significant as witnessed by Arbab Jamshid Bahman Jamshidian becoming the
first Zoroastrian representative in the Majlis. Previously, because of
his honesty and integrity, Jamshidian was awarded the only contract to
supply the Qajar Army with provisions. However, the Qajars were bankrupt,
therefore they could only pay for provisions in instalments, through the
collection of taxes. The promissory notes issued by the Qajars were
lodged with Jamshidian who thereby became the banker to the Government of
Iran, bearing in mind at that time the main banks in Iran were controlled
by the British and Russians.74 Incidentally, it was illegal
for Zoroastrians to trade in Iran before 1860.75
Another example of the
impact of these deputations can be obtained from Arbab KayKhusrow
Shahrokh’s letters to Bhownaggree. Shahrokh was one of the most
distinguished Zoroastrians of the early twentieth century.76
He followed Jamshidian as the second Zoroastrian representative in the
Majlis. By reading Shahrokh’s first letter, from Tehran Persia dated 10th
April 1907, which is an introductory letter to Bhownaggree, it is
clear that Shahrokh regarded Bhownaggree as a person of influence in
Iranian Zoroastrian affairs. Shahrokh addresses his letter;77
“To His Excellency; Sir
Mancherji Merwanji Bhownaggerie, Hon. Exmemeber of British Parliament
London.”
He begins the letter by stating;
“How much fortunate shall I
be to reach to the high dignity of gaining the honour of representing
myself as an atom before the rays of the sun of your Excellencies
benevolence.”
In the next line, Shahrokh
identifies himself not as a Zoroastrian, but more importantly, as “I am a
pure Parsi from Kerman, Persia”. In contemporary Zoroastrian community
politics, Shahrokh’s identification of himself is historically very
significant and can be traced back to Darius’s inscriptions at Behistun in
Kermanshah. In his letter Shahrokh mentions that for eleven years he was
a “teacher in the Parsi School in Kerman”, following his leave he
travelled through Russia and returned back to Persia and has settled in
Tehran since 1905. Accompanying the letter is a basic book on
Zoroastrianism authored by Shahrokh because;
“As I saw generally
Mohammedans, Babists and Christians protest with Zoroastrians in Persia
and as there was not a special book among Parsis in Persia to peruse and
use in their schools to know about their religion, to be able to answer
rejecters and protesters, therefore I intended to write something on this
purpose and I have published a small book in pure simple Persian language
and it has been recently scattered among Mohammedan priests and nobles and
protesters, and they themselves run for gaining it and knowing properly
about the Parsi religion.”
Once again it is important
to note that unlike contemporary Zoroastrians, according to Shahrokh
Parsis and Zoroastrians are the same and uses the terms freely. Shahrokh
in typical Persian humility mentions;
“Although (the book ) is
not worthy of being offered to your Excellency, but as Mr. Ardeshirji
Edulji (Reporter), the representative of the Bombay Parsi Committee in
Persia lead and urged me to forward one copy, therefore I forward it to be
offered to your Excellency. Asking apologies, hoping the acceptance of
that book and wishing yours Excellency’s long life, prosperity, glory and
successfulness for ever.”
He signs off as “Kaykhusrow
Shah Rokh Kermani”.
In another one of
Shahrokh’s letters, again addressed to Bhownaggree, dated 19th
April 1909, Shahrokh stated; “Not a minute one of the Zoroastrians of
Persia forgets to ask God Almighty to increase your successions,
prosperity and benevolence, from which I am most really one of them.
Because, each step your Excellency advances in High ranks, the effects are
our happy days and successions here”.78
Indeed Bhownaggree was held
in high esteem by the Zoroastrians in Iran as can be illustrated by the
annual Navroze Greetings addressed to him, written in golden ink, from the
Anjuman Naseri Zuruthushtiane of Yazd. The English translations reads;
“As by the grace of God and
the graciousness of our Royal Master (the Shah), we are celebrating the
advent of the New Year by ringing in the spring and ringing out the winter
and there is general rejoice over time honoured feast of Jamsheed. We
wish to congradualte you on this auspicious occasion and wish you and
yours all the happiness and prosperity. We sincerely hope you will accept
this expression of good wishes in the spirit it is offered. It would be
overlooked on our part to say anything more on this occasion and we
conclude with prayers to God for your long life and prosperity.” 79
It is also important to
note that on the top right hand side of the Navroze Greeting the date,
which is Aban Mah 1276 Bastani (Kadmi), or November 1907. The ZTFE
archives include similar Navroze greetings also from Kerman.
Shahrokh’s letters
demonstrate that the impact of these deputations on the Qajar Shahs were
considerable! In turn the pressure was put on the masters of Islamic
Jurisprudence and the Ulema. On 21st February 1910, the
Mujtahid of Karballa signed a document titled, “A Fatwa on the Rights
of Zoroastrians” declaring the Zoroastrian community was under the
protection of Islam. The fatwa stated;
“To vex and humiliate the
Zoroastrian community or other non-Muslims, who are under the protection
of Islam is unlawful, and its is obligatory on all Muslims duly to observe
the injunctions of His Holiness the seal of the prophets, respecting their
good treatment , the winning of their affections, and guarding of their
lives, honour and possessions, nor should they swerve by so much as a
hair’s breadth from this, please God Almighty.”80
Even as late as 1913,
Zoroastrians in Iran continued to face problems. The Times of India,
dated 19th April 1913, reported on the Jamsheedi Navroze
function held in London on 4th April 1913. The Times correspondent
commences the article by stating that, “As Good Friday fell on 21st
March the customary Jamsheedi Navroz banquet was celebrated a week later
at the Frascati Restaurant with Sir M. M. Bhownaggree in the chair. There
was a good attendance of Parsis, and the ties of Zoroastrianism were
quickened by the reading of letters of fraternal greeting from the Parsis
of Yazd and Kerman.” A similar report appeared in the National Indian
Association Journal for May 1913. On page 131, it states that;
“Out of considerable
respect to Good Friday, which this year fell on March 21, the day of the
vernal equinox and Jamsheedi Navroz, the celebration of the festival was
postponed for a week by the Parsi community and also by the Persian
Embassy.”81
Rev. E. J. Clifton and Mrs
Clifton were two of the guest invited for the occasion. The Times
correspondent mentions;
“The Rev. E . J. Clifton
has been engaged in educational work in Yazd and Shiraz for some years
past, spoke hopefully of the future of Iran, and of the part that the
Parsis of Iran are destined to play therein. Both Moslems and Europeans
were finding the Parsis of Iran were proving themselves worthy of trust;
and when Persia could show that it possessed men who would not be moved by
bribery the country would come to its own. Referred to the disabilities
from which Zoroastrians still suffered, he praised the work of Major
Sykes, of the Chairman Sir M. M. Bhownaggree, and of the Bombay
Association behalf of their community in Persia. Much remains to be done,
for the Parsis of Iran who are persecuted on the slightest pretext. He
rejoiced that on some occasions, he had been personally able to protect
his Parsi friends and servants from tyranny and persecution. When the
constitutional revolution broke out, a leading Parsi merchant’s life was
threatened in a southern city , whilst his brother was actually murdered
in the capital. Fortunately he (the speaker) had been able to give the
merchant asylum in his own house and keep him in safety until the danger
was over.” It is most likely that Zoroastrian merchant referred to is
Arbab Kaikhosrow Jehanyan who started the first girl’s school in Yazd,
because his brother Parvis was murdered in 1907.82 The Times
reporter concludes;
“Following her husband Mrs.
Clifton declared the Parsi women of Persia to be sweetest of her sex she
had met. She said she had learned from them many lessons of patience and
endurance. Though unveiled in a land of veil women they were absolutely
trusted by their husbands, and as mothers admirably discharged their
duties. She dwelt on the generosity of the Parsi merchants in supporting
hospitals and other philanthropic organisations.”
The ZTFE, through out the
long presidency of Bhownaggree continued to work for the amelioration of
the Zoroastrians in Iran. Under “NOTABLE EVENTS”, the Annual Report of
1920 mentioned the fifth deputation to the Shah in London on Sunday 2nd
November 1919. It stated that the “influential deputation”, headed by
Bhownaggree, was received personally by Ahmad Shah Qajar at the Persian
Legation. The Address as usual took account of full protocol and “was
beautifully illuminated and presented in a massive silver casket.”
It stated;
“From time to time in the
past the lot of our co-religionists at Yazd and in other parts of your
Dominion has been made unhappy and harassing by want of tolerance on parts
of neighbours among whom they form a relatively small minority. Our
Association and Representative Parsee Bodies in India had to bring these
considerations to the notice of the Persian Authorities and especially of
your Grandfather, the Shah Muzaffar al-Din on his visit to Europe in
1900. Since then their lot has been steadily ameliorated, and our
fraternal interest in their welfare permits the confident assurance that
under the constitutional reign of Your Majesty they will receive equality
of opportunity and treatment with all other classes of your subjects, and
will suffer no civil or religious disabilities, thus strengthening the
attachment to your throne and person of one of the most loyal and devoted
sections of your Empire.”83
The annual report
continues, “His Majesty made the following gratifying reply;
“I am glad to receive you,
gentlemen, as the Representative of the Parsees who, as you have well
said, remind us of the glorious traditions of the Fatherland. I thank you
for the sincere sentiments and good wishes to which you have given
expression. It has always been my aim to promote long-standing relations
of unalloyed friendship existing between Persia and Great Britain, and I
am gratified at the pleasing opportunity offered to me to come over here
with the object of strengthening these ancient ties to the mutual
advantage of the two Empires. I have always had at heart the well being
of my Parsee subjects whose love for the Fatherland, intelligence,
probity, perseverance, laboriousness, all of which fit them to contribute
very effectively to the common task of increasing the prosperity of the
country. Although the constitutional laws of Persia guarantee to the
Parsee their full rights as Persian citizens, I am happy to assure you,
gentlemen, that their welfare will ever form the object of my personal
solicitude.” It is important to note the linking of the welfare of
Zoroastrians with better relations with Britain. Referring to the
Zoroastrian religion, Ahmad Shah stated;
“The very name of our
Persian race recalls the lofty yet Deistic faith which was one of the many
gifts of Persia to civilisation before the dawn of history”. Thus, Ahmad
Shah Qajar acknowledged the contribution of the teaching of prophet
Zarathushtra to the basic foundation of religions, because one of the main
reasons of Zoroastrian persecution was due to the failure to recognise
Zarathushtra as a prophet by sections of the Iranian society.
A letter dated 25th
February 1920 from the Anjuman Naseri Zuruthushtiane of Yazd addressed to
Bhownaggree, the Zoroastrians in Iran are happy to learn that the Parsis
of Great Britain petitioned the Shah about their conditions. Its contents
state;
“It is with great pleasure
we read the address of the Parsee Association of Europe under your
Presidency to His Majesty the Shah of Persia on the occasion of his visit
to Europe. With high sense of gratitude we learn that the Members of the
Association have been kind enough to make in that address mention of their
co - religionists in Persia, thereby pleading their cause and suggesting
the means by which to bring about their welfare and safety.”84
In comparison, the Annual
Report of 1926 reported the Address to Reza Shah Pahlavi. It stated;
“As it was felt by the
Association that some recognition should be sent to His Imperial Majesty,
the new Shah of Persia on his accession to the throne of our Fatherland,
especially knowing the interest he took in the welfare of our Community.
The Committee forwarded to His Majesty, through His Excellency Prince
Nadir Mirza Arasteh, the Persian Charge d’Affaires. The Resolution
transcribed on illuminated vellum;
“That at this, the first
Meeting of the Committee of the Parsee Association of Europe, London,
since the Coronation of His Imperial Majesty Reza Shah Pahlavi as
Shah-en-Shah of Persia, the Committee begs to leave to convey their
congratulations upon his accession. It is their prayer that he may reign
long and prosperously over the country with which they have cherished
ancestral associations and whose peoples include some thousands of their
co-religionists. They rejoice in the many evidences of virility, justice
and wise statesmanship, which were afforded by His Majesty during the
years of his Prime Minister ship. They trace to this cause in large
measure the restoration of good order and prosperity to the country, and
in particular they beg to convey, with their felicitations, warm
appreciation of the paternal interest His Majesty has shown in the welfare
of their fellow Zoroastrians in Iran.”85
The Minute Books of the
Zoroastrian Trust Funds record;
“The gracious Message of
His Imperial Majesty Reza Shah Pahlavi, dated Tehran 17 Mehr 1305, over
his own signature” was received with “deep gratification, and the members
of the Association were profoundly touched by the solicitude expressed
therein by His Majesty for the happiness and welfare of his Subjects.”86
As noted at the outset of
this paper it was rather rare for Reza Shah to put his own signature on a
letter, unless it was being send to a close friend or to someone he
regarded very highly. Furthermore Reza Shah, who as Reza Khan had come to
power by a coup with British backing and hence replaced the last Qajar
Ahmad Shah, was more inclined towards the Zoroastrians because of his very
close friendship with Ardeshir Reporter, who was the third agent of the
“The Society and Fund for the Amelioration of the Condition of the
Zoroastrians in Persia” and like Hataria had a close working relationship
with the British.87
Due to the weakness of
central government in Tehran, Yazd and Kerman was for Zoroastrians what
Southern USA was for African Americans. In 1919, the new governor of
Kerman reinstated the hated jizya contrary to the imperial firman
of August 1882 issued by Nasir al - Din Shah. Upon the urging of the
Zoroastrians of Tehran the central government intervened thus reversing
the governor’s decision.88 On the whole treatment of
Zoroastrians by the local population and the Muslim clergy was relatively
harsher in Yazd then Kerman, partly because of the prominent role played
by Shahrokh. Besides Ardeshir Reporter, another Zoroastrian who was close
to the new Shah was Shahrokh, who persuaded Reza Shah at the outset of his
rule to introduce the ancient Zoroastrian calendar names of the months for
national use. Shahrokh was also responsible for building the Firdausi
National Memorial to celebrate the poet’s millenary in 1934. It were
these millenary celebrations that resulted in many non - Zoroastrian
Iranians naming their newly born children after leading figures of the
Shahnameh, such as Rostom, Sohrab, Hooshang, Shapoor, Manizeh, Faranghis,
Vista etc.89 But the biggest impact was when in 1934 Reza Shah
declared that all foreigners will call the country “Iran” rather than
“Persia”, which was name prior to the Arab invasions and mentioned in the
Avesta.90
Shahrokh was one of the
most distinguished Zoroastrians of the early twentieth century. Shahrokh
was the first Zoroastrian in modern times that dared to ride a horse in
his native Kerman, which until then was forbidden for Zoroastrians.
Shahrokh’s great-great grandfather Bahman was the treasurer to Karim Khan
Zand, while his grand father Goshtasp was the treasurer to Luft Ali Khan.
In 1914, Shahrokh organised the coronation of Ahmad Shah Qajar.91
During the reign of Reza Shah (1925 - 1941), Shahrokh became nationally
known, when he returned from Washington after been successful in
re-establishing diplomatic relations with the United States. The break of
diplomatic relations happened when a group of American tourists were
murdered in Iran. They were onlookers at a passion play, depicting the
martyrdom of Imam Hussein and were taking photographs. The crowd attacked
and killed the visiting Americans.92 However, recent research
shows that Robert Imbrie, the American who was brutally killed in Tehran
on Friday 18th July 1924 was not only the United States Consul
in Tehran, but a special agent of the State Department.93 The
other two Iranians who accompanied Shahrokh to the US were Dr. Siddiq Alam
and the well known nationalist Dr. Mossadaq. Shahrokh, described by the
speaker of the Majlis, Mujtahid Mudarres “as the only real Muslim in the
Majlis” because of his integrity, which was later echoed by Ayatollah
Khomeini.94
The records of the
Zoroastrian Trust Funds of Europe show that the Resolution of 19th
June 1926 to Reza Shah was the final address sent to the Shah of Iran by
the Zoroastrians of Britain. After this, there were no more, because Reza
Shah had kept his word regarding the happiness and welfare of all his
subjects. The advent of the Reza Shah era had a particular relevance to
the Zoroastrians in Iran, because of the nationalist ideology and vision
of the new Shah. It was during Reza Shah that all the discriminatory laws
against Zoroastrians were finally removed, with a few exceptions such as
becoming a prime minister or a high court judge etc. Policies on equal
rights for Zoroastrians were enforced such as the treatment of Zoroastrian
farmers and traders. For the first time the Zoroastrians were permitted
to join the Iranian Armed forces and subsequently General Nowzari became
the first Zoroastrian of the Iranian Army in modern times.95
Nine years after the
coronation of Reza Shah in 1926, Bhownaggree passed away at the age of 82,
on 14th November 1933 and was interned at the Zoroastrian
Cemetery at Brookwood Surrey. In 1940, Shahrokh became a victim of a hit
and run car accident and was interned at the Zoroastrian Cemetery in
Tehran. The world was at war and it is alleged that Shahrokh was
assassinated on the orders of Reza Shah96. A year later, on 16th
September 1941, Reza Shah was forced to abdicate in tragic circumstances
and Iran was occupied by Great Britain, USA and USSR. With Reza Shah’s
abdications came the end of another chapter in the long history of
Zoroastrians in Iran. It started when Seth Manekji Limji Hataria of the
Amelioration Society landed in Bushire in April 1854, when the
Zoroastrians in Iran were on the verge of extinction and numbered only
7000. But within less then a century, like the eternal Simurgh the
Zoroastrians had risen again to assist the Fatherland, just like the
Parsis were doing in India, their adopted homeland.
In 1990, at a conference
organised British Institute of Middle Eastern Studies at the School of
Oriental and African Studies, University of London, F. Ershad delivered a
paper titled; “The Historical Migrations of India As a Brain - Drain
Movement”. He mentions that, “the first outstanding migration wave from
Iran to India occurred in the eighth century, was those of the Zoroastrian
groups. They were mostly the religious elites, astronomers and
merchants.”97 Eckenard Kulke, in his book titled; “The Parsis
in India; A Minority as Agent of Social Change”, outlines the numerous
contributions of the Parsis in the nineteenth and early twentieth century
who laid the foundations not only to Indian industry but also to Indian
democracy. Thus resulting in modern India becoming a global player by in
the end of the twentieth century. Just imagine the heights Iran would
have achieved if the Zoroastrians had not been persecuted in Iran, their
ancestral homeland.
References Cited
[1]
J. K. Amighi “The Zoroastrians of Iran: Conversion, Assimilation, or
Persistence” (AMS Press, 1990)
[2]
M. Boyce “Manekji Limji Hataria in Iran” in K. R. Cama Oriental
Institute Golden Jubilee Volume (Bombay 1969).
[3]
M. Boyce Zoroastrians: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices (Routledge,
London, 1979, repr. 1986, 1987 and 2000).
[4]
M. Boyce A Persian Stronghold of Zoroastrianism (Oxford, 1977,
repr. University Press of America, Maryland, 1989).
[5]
E. G. Browne A Year Amongst The Persians (Wiley, Sussex 2001).
[6]
F.W.S. Craig British Parliamentary Election Results 1885 - 1918
(Macmillan Press Ltd, 1974).
[7]
F. K. Dadachanji Parsis: Ancient & Modern & Their Religion (Karachi
1989)
[8]
J. Darmesteter (trans) “The Vendidad of The Zend Avesta” in M. Muller
(ed) Sacred Books of The East, 50 vols. (Oxford 1887 repr.
Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi, 1980).
[9]
H. J. M. Desai “Winning over the king” in J Patel (ed.) Parsiana
Journal (Bombay March 1996), 78 - 84.
[10]
H. E. Eduljee Kisseh-i Sanjan (Cama, Bombay, 1996).
[11]
R. N. Frye The Golden Age of Persia: Arabs in the East (Weidenfeld,
London 1975).
[12]
P. Godrej & F. Punthakey - Mistree A Zoroastrian Tapestry: Art,
Religion & Culture (Mapin 2002).
[13]
M. L. Hataria Rishale Ej Har Shiyaate Iran (Union Press, Bombay
1865).
[14]
M. L. Hataria “The Land that Time Forgot” in J. Patel (ed) Parsiana
Journal (Bombay, August 1990).
[15]
J. R. Hinnells Zoroastrians in Britain (Oxford, 1996).
[16]
J. R. Hinnells & O. Ralph Bhownaggree ~ Member of Parliament: 1895
- 1906 (Hansib, London, 1995).
[17]
S. H. Hodivala “The Correct Date of Arrival: 936 A.C.” in K. P.
Mistree Zoroastrianism: An Ethnic Perspective (Zoroastrian
Studies, Bombay 1982), 105 - 106.
[18]
C. Irving Crossroads of Civilisation: 3000 Years of Persian History
(Weidenfeld & Nicholson, London, 1979, 1988).
[19]
A.V. W. Jackson Persia Past and Present (New York 1906).
[20]
D. Jahanian “Zoroastrians in Islamic Iran” in R. Rivetna (ed)
FEZANA Journal (Chicago, Fall 2000), 57-61.
[21]
D. F. Karaka History of the Parsis, 2 Vols. (Macmillan & Co.,
London 1884 repr. Delhi 2000).
[22]
B. K. Karanjia Give me a Bombay Merchant Anytime!: Life of Sir
Jamsetjee Jeejeebhoy, Baronet (Bombay 1998).
[23]
E. Kulke. The Parsis in India: A Minority as Agent of Social Change (Vikas,
Delhi, 1974.
[24]
N. Malcolm Five Years in a Persian Town (Murray, London 1905).
[25]
A. Mama “Manekji Limji Hataria: Redeeming a community” in J. Patel
(ed.) Parsiana Journal (Bombay May 1990), 26 - 30.
[26]
A. Mama “HMS Trincomalee: Britain’s oldest warship afloat” in J. Patel
(ed.) Parsiana Journal (Bombay, January 2000), 28-35.
[27]
F. Mehr “Causes of Decline of Iranian Zarthoshti Population Since
Nineteenth Century” in K. D. Irani & F. Mehr (ed.) Humata: Journal
of Centre for Ancient Iranian Studies (Newton MA, Spring & Summer
2002), 71 - 78.
[28]
D. Menant & M. M. Murzban The Parsis, 3 Vols. (Bombay 1917,
repr. Danai, Bombay, 1994).
[29]
K. P. Mistree Zoroastrianism: An Ethnic Perspective
(Zoroastrian Studies, Bombay 1982).
[30]
P. Nanavutty The Parsis (Parsi Anjuman, Delhi, 1992).
[31]
G. K. Nariman “The Legend Of The Persecution Of The Parsis By The
Arabs In Iran” in D. Menant & M. M. Murzban The Parsis, 3 Vols.
(Danai, Bombay 1994), 155-159.
[32]
Mobed Jehangiri Oshidari Yadashthaey Kaikhosrow Shahrokh
(Tehran 1977).
[33]
R. Shahmardan Tarik-i Zarthustian Pas-as Sasanian (Tehran, 1982).
[34]
E. Sanasarian Religious Minorities in Iran (Cambridge, 2000).
[35]
S. Shahrokh & R. Writer Memoirs of Kaikhosrow Shahrokh (Edwin
Mellon Press Wales 1995).
[36]
R. Writer Contemporary Zoroastrians: An Unstructured Nation
(University Press of America, Maryland, 1994).
[37]
M. P. Zirinsky “Blood, Power, And Hypocrisy: The Murder of Robert
Imbrie And American Relations With Pahlavi Iran, 1924” in Institute
Journal Middle Eastern Studies 18 (1986) 275–292.
[38]
Zoroastrian Trust Funds of Europe Minute Book, 1861–1894.
[39]
Zoroastrian Trust Funds of Europe Minute Book, 1901–1908.
[40]
Zoroastrian Trust Fund Of Europe, Bhownaggree Letters, Box File
1.
[41]
Zoroastrian Trust Funds of Europe Annual Reports 1932 & 1933.
|