|
Considerations of Eco-theology are concerned
with the place of flora and fauna in the vision of creation of a
theology. There, we encounter a set of issues: i) How do we take the
World to be a creation of a supernatural creator? ii) Are we the entities
of creation to be viewed as having some special purpose or function? iii)
What attitude are members of a tradition expected to adopt towards these
entities?
Different kinds of theologies provide
different perspectives on these issues. Archaic polytheistic traditions
provide different deities for different entities. Monotheistic traditions
naturally ascribe all creation to a single Divinity.
In the monotheistic Abrahamic religions, which
accept the account of creation as given in the Book of Genesis in the Old
Testament, a single Divinity created the World. The World was created as
a place where Humanity would live. The existence of flora and fauna could
be comprehended by their being of utility to human life. In polytheistic
religions the function and status of specific entities in the world
depended on the divinities that represented and protected them. And the
standing of the divinity depended on the social structure of the pantheon
and the alliances and tensions among them. The stories of their
relationships were reflected in events on earth and frequently provided
explanations of natural phenomena.
The world of vegetation consisted of grasses
of pastureland, cereals and trees yielding fruits and firewood. During
the early pastoral period pastures were of major importance. And there
were divinities of stature to protect them. During the agricultural
period human existence depended on the adequate availability of cereals,
with a looming threat of harvest failure. The crucial events of growth
and death of vegetation, a concern in every early civilization, called for
explanation. There is in Greek mythology an account of this situation –
the Myth of Demester and Kore.
The story in brief I this: Demester, the
goddess of Earth had a daughter, Kore, the goddess of Corn, who was
abducted by Hades, the lord of the Underworld. Demester, in a state of
deep depression, lost interest in the World, especially the earth’s
supportive function for vegetation. And Kore’s absence on earth resulted
in the absence of cereals. In this dire condition, Zeus was called upon
to intervene. Zeus and the gods worked out a compromise: Hades would hold
Kore for a certain period each year, and return Kore to her mother for the
rest of the year. When Kore emerged from the Underworld vegetation
flourished only die when she was taken back to the Underworld. Thus the
natural phenomenon of generation, growth and death were explained and the
time of harvesting determined by the story.
This myth is particularly significant because
not only does it account for the seasonal regeneration of vegetation; it
also becomes the paradigm for resurrection myths.
There is another theological vision which may
well have originated with Zarathushtra, and that is, the postulation of a
Principle which underlies Existence, in accordance with which creation
unfolds. We encounter this notion of Orderliness in Chinese religious
thought as coming from the Mandate of Heaven; or reconstituted in its
dynamical from as the transforming balance between the complementary
powers, Yin and Yang. In the Buddhist account, what we call existence
would be considered the ephemeral manifestation of causal laws generated
by various needs and desires, but ultimately unreal.
Focusing on Zarathushtra’s vision we come to
see that the World was conceived to evolve according to a Divinity created
Ideal Principle of Order, it is called Asha, the Ultimate Truth. This
Order is manifested in Nature as well as in Society. However, the World
we find ourselves in is not an ideal one. That is to be understood by the
fact that in the World there are two vectors, one to promote Asha, the
other to oppose it. And thus the extraordinary orderliness of Existence,
as well as the appearance of chaos and disorderliness is accounted for.
One can look at the emergence of the flora and
the fauna and the evolution of their earlier forms to more complex ones as
part of an underlying Order. And even though frustrated from time to
time, here and there, evolution marches on hopefully to a scheme of
harmony which would be perfection. It is we, humans, who through
conscious judgment must participate to bring about this ideal final state,
termed the final renovation. Thus every aspect of Nature is part of a
Divine Scheme of Ideal Order, worthy of respect, to be treated by us with
a will to enable it to perform its role in the progression of creation, so
that all aspects of creation are made to cooperate toward the goal of
perfection.
It is interesting to note that various
mythologies of plant and animal life disappeared as archaic and
non-functional modes of thought. However, the Biblical account of creation
by divine command, i.e. pure creative acts of God is still considered by
many today as literally true, thus leading to a rejection of the Theory of
Evolution from Darwin to its contemporary formulations. This is the main
conflict between Science and Religion in contemporary discussions,
especially Fundamentalist Christianity.
There is no such conflict in Zarathushtrian
tradition. The theory of Evolution of today offers scientific explanation
of molecular complexity forming biological cells leading to higher
biological organisms and through neurological complexity to conscious
animals. What must impress anyone is the enormous underlying movement
toward increasing organization of complexity in the vast set of
possibilities of disorganization. For a believing Zarathustrian this is a
vivid functioning of Asha. But regardless of one’s belief, there is no
doubt that there is not, nor can there be, a conflict between science and
religion in the Enlightened Faith of Zarathushtra. It is open to
scientific understanding as the revelation of Asha inspiring us to respect
this grand design on its path to eventual perfection.
[i]
This article was featured in the Spring 2005 issue of the FEZANA
journal, and was posted on vohuman.org on July 4, 2005 courtesy of
its author Professor Kaikhosrov D. Irani, and the guest editor of the
FEZANA journal, Dr. Sam Kerr.
|