USHAO
Volume III No. 
12 
February-March 2003: Mah 
Spendarmad, Fasal Sal 1371: Gathas: 16-3-03/20-3-03  
ARVERDEGAN
for
THE BLESSINGS OF 
FRAVASHIS 
We commemorate the Fravashis of men and women of all climes,
who have worked for the 
furtherance of righteousness. 
May the Fravashis bless us 
with knowledge and health.    
May they keep watch over our 
abodes, and may they always protect us. 
Let us so live that our 
living may be an honor to our departed. 
 
“There are no reserved 
seats in the theater of God.  There are no classes in the amphitheatre of 
the Creator.  There are no bargains, there are no sales and there are no 
purchases.  It is all a plan of God.  Those who understand, and those 
who know how to receive without distinction, those who know how to forget 
themselves gazing at the sacred fire, those who are convinced that the Life in 
its essence is clean, is pure, is Love and is God, become the receivers of love 
from all sides and all quarters.  They know that love is not a commodity 
for storing, that love has to be consumed in the burning fire to create 
fragrance for all and to be sent to all the four corners of the globe that it 
may reach every one.”[Jamshed 
Nusserwanji] 
 
 
IN THIS ISSUE
05 ZARATHUSHTRA’S RELIGION OF JOYOUSNESS: P.D. Mehta
06 HEROINES OF ANCIENT IRAN: Stories of Purandukht & Azarmdukht
The Marchioness of Winchester
      
12       BAI DOSIBAI DASTURNA [Life 
Sketch] 
 
FIRE A SACRED ELEMENT
Framroz 
Rustomjee 
Z
arathushtra discovered that 
Fire was one earthly symbol that interpreted, to the fullest, God’s Great Law of 
Order.  The several Sparks that go to form the fire eventually blend into 
one great flame which, throws its beams upwards, drawing down as it were from 
the God of the Universe the energy that is needed to keep itself active.  
Thus fire stood as the magnificent symbol of Law, Energy, Force, Light and 
Radiance.  Then Zarathushtra realized how 
very essential it was to feed the fire with fragrant wood and incense.  Zarathushtra was realizing 
all this knowledge from within the depth of0 himself.  The Fravashi that 
dwelt within Zarathushtra 
was revealing more and more of His Glory to God’s servant to prepare him for his 
mission among mankind, drinking deeper and deeper at the Fountain of Divine 
Lore, increasing in wisdom and stature towards the goal of 
Perfection. 
      Zarathushtra was not slow to 
realize the Holy Flame that burnt within him.  It was the Spark of God that 
was rising into flame. He saw that the flame within him had to be perpetually 
energized, and that the only way in which he could do so was by the fragrance of 
righteous thoughts, words and deeds of his life, which served as the inner 
offering to the flame within him.  He therefore tended the Sacred Flame of 
his temple with offering of dry fragrant wood as a constant reminder to his mind 
of the fragrant offering of absolutely pure thoughts – Humata, of 
absolutely pure words – Hukhta, and of absolutely pure deeds – 
Huvarashta. 
      Zarathushtra learnt that 
fire was an element that could never be made impure, but that it could burn away 
and thus cleanse all impurity, though the human conscience was bound to receive 
its pangs by any act done to pollute a fire.  Zarathushtra therefore 
taught laws of guidance of all mankind to preserve fire as sacred element.  
On earth, fire represented the Indwelling Divine Energy.  He commended all 
the priests of his religion to tend the fires of the temples, and to recognize 
in the radiance of the fire, the all-pervading Love and Mercy of God, whose 
abode always is the abode of Light. 
      It is interesting to observe how very 
scientifically and by a gradual process of deep culture Zarathushtra became the 
Enlightened One in those prehistoric times. His profound views on religion 
disclose the reaction of the mind against the mere worship of nature, which 
drifts the mind into polytheism and into “the Doctrine of Emanations.” 
[Source: ‘The Life of Holy Zarathushtrta’ by the author] 
 
 
IN PRAISE 
OF GATHAS 
From all that dwells below the skies,
Let faith and hope with joy arise,
Let beauty, truth, and good be sung,
In every land and every tongue.
 
SAOSHYANT
[Part 
Three] 
Ali A. 
Jafarey 
Saoshyant in Pahlavi 
Scriptures 
      I would prefer to present the Pahlavi version as 
given by my Mentor Dasturji Dr. Mankeckji N. Dhalla, in his outstanding work, 
“History of Zoroastrianism”, New York 1938, pages 423-427. 
“THE 
RENOVATION 
      “Those who further the work of final 
restoration: The work of regenerating the world was commenced by Gayomard, 
the first man, and was looked forward to from the time of the Gathas, will be 
brought to completion and perfection by Sashyos the last savior.  Gayomard, 
Jamshid, Zarathusht, and all pious men who have worked for the betterment of the 
universe are among those that help in bringing about the final renovation.  
The great work proceeds with greater or lesser success according as mankind are 
stronger or weaker in the practice of righteousness as various periods.  In 
two of his visions the prophet sees a tree with four and seven branches 
respectively. The branches are made of different metals and represent the 
various periods of the religious history of Zoroastrianism.  The first and 
the golden branch represents the golden age of the faith under King Gushtasp 
[Vishtaspa], the silver and steel boughs symbolize a decadence, while the iron 
branch, or age of the great catastrophe, is the period of the final overthrow of 
the empire, the overwhelming cataclysm that threatened to submerge the world 
except the triumph of virtue and right.  When the mighty work of reclaiming 
mankind from evil is accomplished, there will follow the Renovation of the 
universe.  Those who work to bring this period nearer are said to be 
holding communion with Ormazd.  
      “Saviors: Born immaculately: Ormazd sends 
his special messengers at various periods of chaos and confusion to save 
humanity from the clutches of Ahriman.  This is clear in the Gathas as in 
the Yonger Avesta.  These Messianic heralds of the real truth to be 
embodied in the final Soshyos, exemplify righteousness completes and translates 
the abstract teachings of religion into concrete actions that thus make the 
seemingly incomprehensible intelligible and tangible to the masses.  The 
most prominent among these leaders in the last three millennium, as noted 
before, are the three sons that are to be born miraculously to Zarthusht from 
his seed through a supernatural conception by a maid, bathing in the waters of 
lake Kans (an idea as old as Yasht 19), and the names of these three ideal 
promoters of mankind, as perpetuated in the forms current during the Pahlavi 
period as Hoshedar, Hoshedar-mah and Soshyos, who will appear at an interval of 
a millennium each.  It is said that Zarthusht went three times to his wife 
Hvovi and each time the seed went to the ground.  On each of these 
occasions, important for mankind, the spiritual seeds were caught up by the 
angle Neryosangh and entrusted to the keeping of Ardvisur, the divinity of 
waters, and from these sanctified waters they will be born in time to come, as 
miraculously conceived at different periods by three virgins.  The advent 
of all-beneficial renovators of the faith for the regeneration of the world 
will, as we shall see below, be attended with portents and miraculous 
signs. 
 
      “The millennium of Hoshedar: A child is 
born to a virgin named Shemik-abu of the age of fifteen, who miraculously 
conceives Zarathusht’s seed when she drinks the waters from a pool. The seed was 
emitted during the lifetime of Zarathusht and lay concealed in the waters 
until the maiden kindled the germs and became pregnant.  The child thus 
immaculately born in the first three millenniums of the world is named Hoshedar, 
a later modified corrupt transcript of the Avestan Ukhshyatereta. In the first 
of the last three thousand years of the world, before the final renovation and 
the resurrection, he holds, at the age of thirty, a conference with Ormazd and 
receives a revelation.  When he returns from this divine conference, 
Hoshedar makes the sun stand still for ten days and ten nights to convince the 
people of the   world about authenticity of his mission.  During 
his millennium, righteousness, liberality, and all the virtues supreme will be 
practiced during this aeon.  Two thirds of the people of Iran, according to 
the Pahlavi texts, will turn out righteous. The wisdom of the religion will 
constantly increase the poverty of the people and slaughter of cattle will 
decrease, as she is the benefactor that will help the wickedness of the wolfish 
nature of mankind. 
      “The millennium of Hoshedar-mah: A maiden 
named Shapir-abu is destined to approach the waters and conceive thereby, again 
through the second seed of Zarthusht.  The virgin who has never approached 
man gives birth to a child who is named Hoshedar-mah, an imperfect rendering of 
the Avestan Ukhshyant-nemangh, who confers with Ormazd.  At the age of 
thirty years he announces his advent by making the sun to stand still for twenty 
days and twenty nights.  His benign presence and Messianic power, it is 
destined, will destroy the wicked power of every serpentine and monster 
engender.  Mankind greatly advances toward the realization of the final 
goal of perfection during this millennium.  Cattle give milk in great 
quantities.  In connection with this millennium view, it may be added, from 
the Pahlavi texts of this later period, that the small cattle which gives milk 
will give milk then in redoubled quantity, and a cow will give such milk as 
could be used by a thousand men.  Hunger and thirst will decrease, as the 
world reaches nearer to its perfection.  A single meal will be sufficient 
to satisfy a man for three days.  Mankind will furthermore become so versed 
in the art of healing, and in the science of physical culture that it will be 
able to withstand disease and death more successfully.  Humility, peace, 
and liberality will be now and forever more zealously practiced by 
men. 
 
      “The millennium of Soshyos: The word 
according to the Pahlavi texts, which carry onward the ideal teachings of 
Zarathusht in the Gathas as developed further in the Younger Avesta, in ever 
striving and tending toward final betterment, and will reach perfection in the 
millennium of Soshyos. It needs only the final touch of the greatest of 
renovators to bring about the result for the eternal welfare of the universe. 
Men by this time, when these millennial conditions have been reached have ceased 
eating meat, and subsist on milk, and vegetables form only food of mankind. The 
Bundahisn moreover, adds that, before Resurrection and the Renovation of the 
universe occur, men will give up milk, vegetables, and even water and they will 
ultimately subsists without food of any kind, and yet not die.  Still 
another Pahlavi text states that during the period of the fifty-seven years of 
the activity of this last apostle mankind will be able to subsists for seventeen 
years simply on vegetables, then thirty on water alone and for the last ten 
years on spiritual food. 
 
 
 
      “At this time according to the texts, when the 
world is ripe to welcome the last of the prophets, a virgin named Gobak-abu 
conceives immaculately the third seed of Zarthusht in the same manner as her two 
forerunners had done.  At the age of fifteen she becomes pregnant and gives 
birth to the most illustrious Soshyos in the realm of Khvaniras.  When the 
final savior is thirty years of age, the sun stands still in the zenith, of the 
sky for thirty days and thirty nights; through his supernal power of the demonic 
nature among men will be broken.  He will cause Resurrection and the future 
existence.   His body, which is as radiant as the sun, partakes only of 
spiritual food and he is clad with kingly glory.  Around him he looks with 
the power of six eyes and he it is that foresees the end of the Evil 
Spirit.  He is the greatest renovator of the world.  He comes to 
restore the dead to life, and to bring final perfection to the 
world.                
     
      “Any kind of wickedness that may still be 
lingering, in spite of the supreme beneficence will perish through his 
presence.  The angels will enable mankind to cooperate with the great 
apostle Soshyos to rout Druj.  In advance of his divine mission to 
the world he has met Ormazd in conference and has received the supreme sanction 
for his task. During the fifty-seven years of his work, he will drive out the 
drujes from the world, and will make the world eternally 
happy.” 
      Dasturji Dhalla has provided his chapter of twelve 
pages [423-433] with Pahlavi references to present it in a condensed form 
[references not stated here for the sake of brevity].  He has nothing to 
mention on Shah Bahram Varjavand even in his nine chapters on “A Period 
of Decadence from the seventh to the eighteenth century” (pages 437-477). 
[To be continued].  
ZARATHUSHTRA’S RELIGION OF JOYOUSNESS
P.D. Mehta
M
any people shy away from 
religion because they feel that to be religious means to be solemn, to shun the 
legitimate joys of everyday life, to spend one’s life praying and fasting, in 
short to be miserable.  Nothing could be further from truth.  
Religious living simply means living daily secular life virtuously. It can well 
include prayer and worship, for those are spontaneous expressions of man’s 
tenderly growing awareness of Transcendence, and of the fact that he is 
primarily a religious being and only secondarily everything else.  Zarathushtra as a man of 
action and as a Prophet of God was a very practical man with sound psychological 
insight.  He well knew that man of course will run away from a misery 
agent, but incline favorably towards happiness bringer.  So he affirmed 
that not only God but also this physical world is good.  Thus one of the 
outstanding features of Zarathushtrian religion is its 
joyousness. 
Zarathushtra says:
“Tell me truly, O Ahura, How may I walk in beatific joy with you in full companionship (Ys.44.17)
“Of this (Holy) Spirit. Thou art indeed the Holy Father; Thou didst create this earth for our joy. (Ys.47.3)
[Source: “Zarathushtra – The 
  Transcendental Vision”:by the 
  author] 
 
 
HEROINES OF ANCIENT IRAN
The Marchioness of Winchester
Stories of Purandukht and 
Azarmdukht 
PURANDUKHT 
      After the death of Shirwi (A.D. 628), who ruled 
only for seven months, several other sons of Khusrau Parwiz ruled over Iran; but 
were murdered by different conspirators until no Princes were left. Thus, for a 
considerable period, the country had no King.  Eventually, however, the 
people gave the throne and crown to Princess Purandukht, a sister of Shirwi, and 
a descendant of Sasan  
Purandukht (Puranducht, A.D.630-631) was a good and gentle lady, and had been horrified at the part Shirwi had taken to bring his father’s death. Now that the country had made her its Queen, she determined to purify the atmosphere, and to see that justice was adequately meted out to the wrongdoers and that peace prevailed. Her words, as she took her seat upon the throne, may serve as evidence of her great zeal:
I will not have
The people scattered and I will enrich
The poor with treasure that they may not bide
In their distress, God grant that in the world
There may be none aggrieved, because his pain
Is my calamity, I will expel
                              Foes from my realm, and walk in royal 
ways.     
      Wise as she was good, Queen Purandukht very soon 
succeeded in reviving law and order in the land of Iran.  But her reign 
proved all too brief.  Within six months of her accession to the throne, 
she fell ill and died.  Reflecting on the sudden death of Purandukht, the 
poet gives us some of the finest couplets in the Shahnama, 
the wise man of Tus anticipating by many centuries some of the famous quatrains 
in the Rubaiyat of Omar 
Khayyam:     
Such is the process of the turning sky, For sixty years o thirty, ten or four,
So potent while so impotent are we! It cometh to one thing, when all is done,
If thine be opulence or poverty, If thou hadst many years or barely one.
If life affordeth gain or loss to thee, Oh! May thine actions thine own comrades be,
If thou shalt win what thou desirest so, For they in every place will succor thee.
Or disappointed be in wretchedness, Let go thy clutch upon this Wayside Inn
And whether thou be one of wealth or woe, Because a goodlier place is thine to win,
Both woe and wealth will pass away no less, If thine endeavor be to learning given,
      Reign as a Shah a thousand years, five 
score,   Thou wilt by knowledge roam revolving 
heaven. 
      Purandukht was the first historical Shahbanu, who 
as reigning sovereign of Iran graced the throne of Cyrus and Darius, Ardshir and 
Shapur.  Among other things, she is said to have restored the  “True 
Cross”, but it seems more probable that this was done in the reign of Ardshir, 
her predecessor on the throne of Iran, if the date of its elevation at 
Jerusalem---14th of September in the year 629 of the Christian era is correct. 
 
 
AZARMDUKHT
      After the death of Purandukht, her sister 
Azarmdukht (Azermidocht, A.D. 631-632) came to the throne. Although a capable 
ruler, with excellent intentions, she seems to have been a somewhat formidable 
lady, intolerant and over-conscious of her power, as may be gathered from her 
first address to the people: 
O sages, veterans
And masters of affairs! Be just in all,
And follow precedent, for ye hereafter
Must make the bricks your pillow. I will foster
The loyal liege, assist him with dinars
And if he erreth be long suffering;
But him that is disloyal and deserteth
The way of wisdom and of precedent
Will I suspend in shame upon the gibbet,
Be he an Arab, Ruman cavalier,
                        Or Persian Thane.  
      We are told that the chief noble of the time, who 
was governor of Khurasan, wished to make Azarmdukht his wife, upon which she had 
him privately executed for his presumption.  This noble’s son was the 
Rustom, who fought valiantly against the Arabs and fell at the battle of 
Kadisiya some years later.  On hearing of his father’s fate Rustom, who was 
in temporary authority in Khurasan, marched with great army against Azrmudukht, 
overthrew her and put her death.  This occurred when the unfortunate Queen 
had reigned but four months. 
      Azarmdukht was the last Persian Princess who ruled 
the country of Iran in ancient times, and the last heroine whose story is told 
in Shahnama.  Firdausi closes his poem with the reign 
Yazdagird (Isd- egird III, A.D. 632-652), the last Zoroastrian Emperor of Iran. 
[Series concluded]  
 
WISDOM OF THE 
EAST 
Look to this day,
For yesterday is but a dream.
And tomorrow is a vision.
But today well lived,
Makes every yesterday a dream of happiness.
And every tomorrow is a vision of hope.
So, look well to this 
day. 
[Translated from 
Sanskrit]  
 
 
THE SEEDS OF DIVINE
Dr. Jose Luis 
Abreu 
 
Long ago, in ancient times,
A wise man met the divine,
He was given some seeds,
The divine said: “This is 
what men need.” 
He started planting in his hand,
Some seeds of Vohuman,
Later, many people received happiness.
Harvesting fruits of 
Righteousness. 
The plants from those seeds,
Gave countless fruits to humanity,
For some flavored with Armaity.
Somebody said: This is what 
we need. 
After many years of cultivation,
The wise man passed away,
But before that, he addressed all to say,
If I depart, please don’t 
stop the propagation. 
He asked to plant without limitation,
In the color of the skin or nationality,
These seeds should have intensity,
To reach any land ready for 
plantation. 
Nobody should be denied the opportunity,
Of planting these wonderful seeds,
They are for whoever is in the need,
Reaching for better life of 
immortality.  
Somehow the seeds in a different land arrived,
Where nobody thought they could grow,
Some people did not want there the seeds to go,
But despite this adversity, 
they are indeed alive. 
The seeds are growing so fast,
Becoming strong trees,
That a friend said: “Here are at last.”
If you do not believe me, 
come and see. 
These seeds belong to any land,
With a soil made of Vohuman,
Not just to a special personality,
That thinks of chosen by 
divinity. 
It would be against human rights,
Not to give the necessary light,
Needed by the good seeds,
Growing into strong 
trees. 
My friend, the Gathas are the seeds,
That our lives should finally meet,
As they become strong trees,
The House of Song our 
sheltering need.. 
And Zarathushtra is the wise man
One who started the cultivation.
Using our bright Vohuman,
Let’s keep alive his good 
intention. 
 
 
 
 
 
“If we could erase the “I’s” and “mine’s” from religion, politics, economics etc.
We should soon be free and 
bring heaven upon earth. 
[Mahtma 
Gandhi] 
 
 
SHOULD YOU ALWAYS FORGIVE?
Roxanne 
Roberts 
O
n Sept 11, 2002, Toad 
Beamer was on doomed United Flight 93 headed for San Francisco. Minutes before 
the plane crashed into a field in rural Pennsylvania, he asked an air-phone 
operator to send his love to his family, then began to pray, “Our Father, who 
art in Heaven…”  Days later, his widow, Lisa remarked that the Lord’s 
Prayer asks God “to forgive our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass 
against us.  And in some ways, he was forgiving those people for what they 
were doing; the most horrible thing you could ever do to 
someone.” 
      For centuries, the subject of forgiveness has 
fascinated and vexed moral men and women. It pits judgment against mercy, rage 
against compassion, instinct against intellect.  Forgiveness is one of the 
key doctrines in most religions, asking followers to forgive as God forgives 
them. 
      Now there’s a new, practical take on the subject, 
where spirit meets self-interest: Several new books and medical studies conclude 
that people who forgive live longer, healthier and happier lives.  But an 
eye for an eye satisfies the very human desire for fairness.  People are 
punished in direct proportion to their sins.  There is justice in the 
world, and so the debate --- fueled by the horrors of Sept. 11, violence in the 
Mid-east, corporate betrayals, sexual abuses by priests --- moves from the 
pulpit to the pundits.  Forgive because it’s good for you and breaks the 
cycle of hatred.  Don’t forgive because there are some things too terrible, 
too evil for any ethical person to pardon.  From any entirely pragmatic 
point of view, forgiveness is better for you.  
In 1998, the Campaign for Forgiveness Research began to apply scientific data to the subject. Everett Worthington, chairman of the psychology department at Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond is executive director of the campaign and author of “Five Steps to Forgiveness: The Art and Science of Forgiving.” Worthington started his career as a clinical psychologist in marriage counseling, where forgiveness was an ongoing issue. In 1995, just a month after finishing a book on the subject his mother was murdered during a robbery. His initial reaction was to kill the person who did this. Instead he made a painful decision to personally test his theories about forgiveness. His model: to eliminate the emotions of “un-forgiveness” for his own mental and physical health.
      “From a scientific point of view, un-forgiveness 
is a combination of negative emotions, resentment, bitterness, hatred, anger, 
hostility and fear,” says Worthington.  “In the short run, un-forgiveness 
is empowering.  In the long run, un-forgiveness will kill you --- 
literally.” 
      His research suggests un-forgiving people have 
high levels of cortisol, a hormone that is released from the adrenal glands in 
response to stress. Elevated stress hormones are necessary in fight-or-flight 
situations, but not healthy on a permanent basis. That leads to, he says, heart 
attacks, coronary diseases and strokes, ulcers, colitis and immune system 
problems. 
      In February, Prevention magazine reported the 
results of a forgiveness study at Hope College in Holland, Mich.  
Seventy-one subjects were measured for heart rate, blood pressure and stress 
levels and asked to think about people who had lied, insulted or rejected them. 
The test subjects then had a choice: Imagine holding grudges, or forgiving the 
offenders. 
      Forgivers had lower heart rates and blood 
pressure, felt calmer and more in control.  Holding grudges led to higher 
stress and greater feelings of anger and sadness.  The mind-body connection 
is also at the heart of Stanford University’s Forgiveness Project, a six-year 
study directed by Fred Luskin.  He worked with people from Northern Ireland 
whose family members were killed by sectarian violence. The deaths had occurred 
at least two years before – the wounds were deep but not fresh when his subjects 
arrived in California. 
      “They didn’t like the word ‘forgiveness’ when they 
first came,” says Luskin. “But when they learned forgiveness was for them and 
their healing --- not about or for the offender --- they were more open.”  
Over time, the initial desire for vengeance ebbs, and forgiveness becomes more 
of a possibility.  “Forgiveness does not condone horror,” says Luskin. 
“Forgiveness does not mean you have to reconcile with an offender.  And 
forgiveness does not mean that you forget what happened --- you remember to 
protect yourself and loved ones.”  
Good for the 
soul? 
      A case can be made that forgiveness lets offenders 
off too easily creating a moral universe where forgiving slips into forgetting 
and moral laziness passes piety.  If nothing is unforgivable, then the 
boundaries between good and evil become blurred.  Most questions of, 
forgiveness stem from personal betrayals by lovers, spouses, parents, children 
and friends.  Petty arguments slide into lifelong grudges. Even if the 
offender admits he’s wrong, it’s hard.  The issue becomes complicated 
intentionally:  Did the person mean to cause, or was it an accident?  
And by love: People will often forgive their children anything, but not spouses 
or siblings. Then there’s the misunderstood difference between forgiveness and 
justice.  Even if you forgive, you can still believe that person should go 
to jail, get fired or otherwise pay the price of his 
transgression.           
Should you 
forgive? 
      Jeanne Safer, a psychologist and author of 
“Forgiving & Not Forgiving: Why Sometimes It’s Better Not to Forgive”, says 
forgiveness, like love, is an emotional state that’s not entirely 
voluntary.  The problem with all this is that it’s just not possible for 
everyone.  There is no, one-size-fits-all solutions to crimes of the 
heart.  There’s so much pressure on people that they must forgive that it 
leads to a state I christened ‘false forgiveness.’”  
      The “forgiveness lobby” has been effective, says 
Safer, that there is balancing concept of what she calls “healthy 
non-forgiveness.”  The argument has been reduced to forgiveness vs. hatred 
--- when her research indicates there are many shades of gray.  Many people 
Safer interviewed did not forgive, felt better that, they hadn’t forgiven, and 
were not overwhelmed with rage or bitterness.  In fact, they felt 
great.  “To take a moral stance and ethical choices --- based on real 
understanding --- can restore you to health,” she says. “It can be liberating 
because you don’t hate yourself for not forgiving.”  Most of us cannot 
forgive even small heartbreaks, much less massive evil.  
Where to begin? 
 
      There are typically three stages of trauma and 
recovery, says Worthington:  Numbness (which typically lasts one to two 
weeks), an attempt to make sense of what happened (one to two years), and 
finally a desire to move ahead with some form of normal life.  “A lot is a 
matter of timing,” he says.  If you prematurely or too forcefully coerce 
someone into trying to forgive, then that can cause people to react negatively 
with anger, guilt or depression.”  
All about grace 
 
      Or perhaps it’s not about formulas. Perhaps it’s 
about grace.  Steven McDonald is a New York policeman who was shot and 
paralyzed 15 years ago.  His assailant shot him in the head, in the throat 
and then a third time when he was on the ground.  His wife was two months 
pregnant.  What became the focus of their attention was their faith --- 
McDonald is a devout Catholic.  When his baby son was born, seven months 
after the shooting, McDonald says their hearts opened to the “gift” of 
forgiveness “to free us from any bitterness and anger.”  Forgiving the 
offender had very little to do with the shooter and every thing to do with love 
for their son. 
“I’ve often heard the phrase ‘forgive and forget’,” he says. “You never forgive and forget. The memory of the assault is with you always. But God desires us to forgive – for our own well-being.”
[Source: “Faith & Value” Section of “The 
Wichita Eagle”] 
 
SPENTA ARMAITI --- SPENDARMAD
Devotion – Piety – Faith
Ashem shyaothanaish bazaiti armaitish
[Gatha Ushtavaiti 2.6 Ys 44.6]
Armaiti gives grace to 
righteousness by her action. 
      My religion rests on my faith in You, Ahura Mazda, 
and my faith gains strength by the devotion I put into my prayers to you.  
Let my devotion spread into everything I do in my life, however, important or 
trivial, and let all my thoughts, words and deeds be in accord with Your 
will.  Let me always remember you and place you first in all my good 
endeavors.   
      Unswerving faith, in your goodness and love gives 
me peace of mind and peace of heart.  It renews my resolve to tread the 
path of Asha, and to serve its course with devotion and steadfastness. 
 
      Help me, my Lord, to improve and perfect this 
reflection through life of faith, piety and devotion and through the Path of 
your truth as revealed by our Prophet Zarathushtrta.   
      Command me, O Ahura Mazda, and I will follow, 
order me and I will obey; show me the way and I will tread it. I will live for 
you and for your purpose in life with the devotion of Armaiti, and express my 
love for you through a life of love and helpfulness to my fellowmen. 
 
[Source: “Teach Me To 
Pray—A Second Book of Prayers for Zoroastrians: -- Noshir F. 
Vajifdar] 
 
 
 
Bai Dosibai Dasturna
[Wife of Dastur Rustomji Mobedji Kumana of Surat]
[1871—1900] 
 
 
      This learned lady was a prominent figure among the 
Parsis of Surat in her days, being proficient in the history of religion and 
traditions.  She was actually consulted even by elderly priests on matters 
of faith.  She was a descendant of the great Dastur Darab Kumana, the 
leader of the Kadimis in Surat.  In 1865 Sheth Khurshedji R. Cama lectured 
at Surat and this lady had the rare courage to express her views openly at the 
meeting!  
      This unprecedented event created a great 
impression on the Parsis present. Even the great Parsi chronicler, Khan Bahdur 
Bomanji Behramji Patel, author of Parsi Prakash, complimented her by 
saying that she was an authority on matters of ancient history of her 
town. 
      Hearing her fame, Miss Mennant the Oriental savant 
had to record in her book, “Anquetil du Perron” about her fine capacity, which 
had impressed other European scholars as well.  In the portrait shown here 
Miss Mennant wrote in her own handwriting: Dosibai descendante de Darab, 
ie  “Dosibai, the descendant of Darab”  [Source: “Parsi Lustre On 
Indian Soil”: Vol. I of 1939 by H.D. Darukhanwala]  
 
 
 
Fill every day with some kind deed
And you‘ll be truly blessed,
For helping someone who’s in need
Brings peace and 
happiness. 
And you can always guarantee
Your day’s been made worthwhile
When you take the trouble to lend a hand
And go that extra 
mile. 
[Helana Socha] 
 
 
 
 
Please send your articles or queries to: Virasp Mehta
4235 Saint James Place, Wichita KS 67226, U.S.A.
e-mail: viraspm@yahoo.com 
Published for Informal 
Religious Meetings Trust Fund, Karachi